Author
Listed:
- Christina Kranzinger
- Thomas Stöggl
- Helmut Holzer
- Josef Kröll
- Michael Lasshofer
Abstract
To compete successfully in alpine ski racing, not only physical, mental, and skiing technique preparation are important, but also wisely chosen and properly tuned skiing equipment. While equipment related safety aspects are mostly ensured by official rules (e.g., competition rules provided by the International Skiing Federation), the performance optimization and customization of equipment is mostly reliant on coaches and experts in the skiing industry. Therefore, knowledge often is dependent on individual person’s experience and not publicly available. This aspect can also hinder companies or teams to spread knowledge within their own team. However, there is the necessity to select the optimal equipment for each athlete individually within a range of available equipment variations. To improve the process of ski boot selection for racers within a whole company, the presented research had the goal to provide a decision model by extracting and objectifying knowledge from few experts within the company. Based on a Delphi-type expert elicitation approach, together with the company’s boot experts a data collection sheet was designed, including the relevant parameter to decide which ski boot is appropriate for an individual athlete. Thereafter, data analysis of 198 datasets included classification methods based on random forest models to create boot choice recommendation models. Results revealed well predictable recommendation for boot size (accuracy 77%) and acceptable accuracy (57%) for prediction of boot model. With existing limitations of extracting subjective and individual expertise, this approach helps to objectify personalized expertise and distribute knowledge within relevant interest groups.
Suggested Citation
Christina Kranzinger & Thomas Stöggl & Helmut Holzer & Josef Kröll & Michael Lasshofer, 2026.
"From expert opinion to data driven selection of sports equipment: Boot selection in alpine ski racers,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(6), pages 1-12, June.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0349862
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0349862
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0349862. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.