IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0349858.html

Air quality index prediction using machine learning regression models: A comparative analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Fiaz Majeed
  • Sana Saleha
  • Laraib Abbas
  • Syed Ali Ghalib
  • Muhammad Hamid
  • Muhammad Saleem
  • Mohammed Aman
  • Arshad Ahmad

Abstract

Air plays a vital role in human life, and poor air quality can lead to respiratory infections. Given the significant impact of air quality on people’s health, monitoring and assessing air quality is crucial. With advancements in machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI), we now have extensive tools to measure the Air Quality Index (AQI). Air quality is influenced by various pollutants, including carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), ozone (O3), and sulfur dioxide (SO2), which are prevalent in highly polluted areas and contribute to a wide range of illnesses. Particulate matter, such as PM2.5 (particles with an aerodynamic diameter of less than 2.5 µm) and PM10, poses additional health risks. To address these concerns, this study focuses on predicting AQI values for major cities in Pakistan, specifically Karachi and Peshawar, using four prominent ML algorithms: Random Forest (RF), Gradient Boosting (GB), Linear Regression (LR), and Ridge Regression (RR). The results indicate that the models effectively predicted AQI using evaluation metrics such as Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), and the Coefficient of Determination (R2). This research’s novelty lies in using the latest AQI datasets for Karachi and Peshawar and applying standard scaling for AQI normalization. Additionally, the study compares evaluation metric results across different cities, highlighting the importance of using standard scalers to achieve optimal model performance. This research underscores the value of advanced ML techniques for accurate AQI prediction and analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Fiaz Majeed & Sana Saleha & Laraib Abbas & Syed Ali Ghalib & Muhammad Hamid & Muhammad Saleem & Mohammed Aman & Arshad Ahmad, 2026. "Air quality index prediction using machine learning regression models: A comparative analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(7), pages 1-20, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0349858
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0349858
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0349858
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0349858&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0349858?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0349858. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.