Author
Abstract
Information security has become a critical organizational and HR priority in an era of escalating cyber threats. Despite extensive technological investments in cybersecurity infrastructure, the human dimension of information safeguarding remains underexplored, creating significant vulnerabilities in organizational defense mechanisms. This exploratory research investigates employees’ reactions, thoughts, and experiences regarding information safeguarding practices within a large multinational energy corporation in Saudi Arabia. Grounded in Protection Motivation Theory (PMT), this study examines how employees perceive threats to organizational information assets and their behavioral responses to safeguarding imperatives. The research employs a unique dual-method qualitative approach, analyzing 87 firsthand computerized employee comments — one comment contributed by each of 87 distinct employees — extracted from an internal electronic system and conducting 24 semi-structured interviews with full-time employees across various organizational levels. Through systematic thematic analysis, the study identifies five major themes: perceived vulnerability and threat awareness, individual responsibility and accountability, organizational security culture, technical versus human factors in information protection, and knowledge gaps and training. Findings reveal a persistent paradox: heightened threat awareness does not automatically translate into consistent protective behaviors, a pattern moderated by organizational culture, variations in self-efficacy, and response-cost barriers. The study extends PMT to an underexplored context of critical infrastructure. It offers actionable insights for practitioners seeking to cultivate security cultures, address self-efficacy gaps, and design human-centered security interventions in high-stakes organizational environments.
Suggested Citation
Mohamed Mohiya, 2026.
"Employee perspectives on safeguarding information: An exploratory study in a multinational energy corporation,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(10), pages 1-33, October.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0349656
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0349656
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0349656. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.