IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0349473.html

Physical risk factors associated with central serous chorioretinopathy: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Olivia Cundy
  • William Wilson
  • Catey Bunce
  • Timothy L Jackson

Abstract

Background: Central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR) is a common vision-threatening retinal disease that affects predominantly working-age adults. Although often self-limiting, a substantial proportion of cases are either chronic or recurrent, resulting in significant visual, psychological, social and economic burdens on sufferers. Current treatment options are limited and lack robust long-term evidence, reflecting an incomplete understanding of underlying disease mechanisms. Traditionally, CSCR has been researched as a solely ocular condition, however numerous non-ophthalmic physical risk factors have been implicated in the disease, suggesting a broader systemic aetiology. A comprehensive synthesis of physical risk factors for CSCR is needed to inform future mechanistic research and therapeutic development. Objective: The main objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to summarise physical risk factors associated with CSCR, including genetic, hormonal, metabolic and drug- or toxin-related factors. The secondary objective is to describe any associations between individual risk factors and disease severity. Methods and analysis: This protocol has been written in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRSIMA-P). The PRISMA-P Checklist for this protocol can be found in Supplemental Information S2: PRISMA-P Checklist. Observational and interventional studies that report on any physical risk factors for CSCR will be included. Eligible participants are adults (≥ 18 years) with CSCR. Searches will be conducted on MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus and CENTRAL, and supplemented by grey literature and clinical trial registry searches. Two reviewers will independently screen studies, extract data and assess the risk of bias, with any disagreements adjudicated by a third reviewer. Where feasible, meta-analyses will be performed using random-effects models to pool odds ratios for associations between risk factors and CSCR. Heterogeneity of the included studies will be assessed using the I2 statistic. A narrative synthesis will be undertaken when meta-analysis is not possible, in accordance with Synthesis Without Meta-Analysis (SWiM) guidelines. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The certainty of evidence will be evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system. Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval is not required as this study uses previously published aggregate data. Findings will be disseminated through publication in peer-reviewed journal and presentation at relevant scientific conferences. Trial registration: This review protocol is registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO), under registration number CRD420251088489.

Suggested Citation

  • Olivia Cundy & William Wilson & Catey Bunce & Timothy L Jackson, 2026. "Physical risk factors associated with central serous chorioretinopathy: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(10), pages 1-8, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0349473
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0349473
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0349473
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0349473&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0349473?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0349473. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.