Author
Abstract
Algorithmic hiring systems have rapidly proliferated across industries, promising improved efficiency, objectivity, and scalability in recruitment processes. However, growing empirical evidence reveals a gap between these expected benefits and actual outcomes, as many systems inadvertently reproduce or amplify historical inequalities embedded in training data. The main aim of this study is to develop and evaluate a rigorous, multi-layered framework capable of identifying, interpreting, and mitigating bias throughout the full lifecycle of algorithmic hiring systems, ensuring both immediate decision fairness and long-term career equity. To achieve this aim, the Multi-Layer Bias Analysis and Mitigation System (ML-BAMS) is introduced as a comprehensive approach to detecting and mitigating bias in HR recruitment systems. The framework integrates modules for bias decomposition and data diagnostics, recruitment-aware fairness evaluation across multi-stage pipelines, interpretability of opaque models through influence mapping, fairness-preserving representation learning, and longitudinal simulation of career mobility outcomes. Using synthetic hiring datasets, the proposed framework demonstrates substantial reductions in demographic disparities across key fairness metrics, including improvements in demographic parity (32.4%), equal opportunity (28.7%), equalized odds (25.9%), and treatment equality (19.2%), while maintaining competitive predictive accuracy (ΔAccuracy: + 0.024). These findings highlight the importance of integrated sociotechnical approaches that address bias transmission, enhance transparency, and account for long-term impacts. The ML-BAMS framework provides a practical and modular toolset for implementing responsible AI in recruitment, balancing operational performance with ethical considerations of fairness and social equity.
Suggested Citation
Baijia Song, 2026.
"Algorithmic bias in HR recruitment systems: A qualitative analysis of managerial risk and sociological implications,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(6), pages 1-31, June.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0349400
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0349400
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0349400. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.