IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0349341.html

How do recommender systems learn political opinions? A semi-synthetic step-by-step experiment

Author

Listed:
  • Tim Faverjon
  • Jean-Philippe Cointet
  • Pedro Ramaciotti

Abstract

Recommendations play a crucial role in shaping informational diets on social media, raising concerns regarding potential consequences such as political segregation. We take an algorithm explanability approach, as opposed to a description of recommendations, to show how recommenders inadvertently create geometrical representations of the ideological position of users with minimal and ubiquitous platform data, and how this impacts content diets. In comparison to work showing the existence of ideological structures in machine representations, we provide a step-by-step causal explanation of their formation. To achieve this, we compute synthetic recommendations with a model trained on real-world data from a panel of nearly 40 thousand X users and the contents they shared on the platform. We show that elementary recommendation principles trained on content dissemination data produce a spatial representation of the Left-Right positions of users in our panel in the recommender, which is also independent of other common attributes, such as age and gender. We explore the consequences of our findings by modifying these ideological representations in the recommender and analyzing the trade-off in resulting recommendations in terms of political leaning, diversity, and relevance of offered contents.

Suggested Citation

  • Tim Faverjon & Jean-Philippe Cointet & Pedro Ramaciotti, 2026. "How do recommender systems learn political opinions? A semi-synthetic step-by-step experiment," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(5), pages 1-20, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0349341
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0349341
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0349341
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0349341&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0349341?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0349341. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.