IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0349128.html

Global burden-integrated analysis of osteoarthritis research-to-translation dynamics, 1999–2023

Author

Listed:
  • Riya Mukherjee
  • Chung-Ming Chang

Abstract

Background: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a leading cause of global disability, yet the temporal relationship between disease burden and research and translational activity has not been systematically examined using an integrated, system-level framework. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, system-level analysis of osteoarthritis (OA) research and disease burden from 1999 to 2023. Annual global OA burden estimates (prevalence, YLDs, and DALYs) were obtained from the Global Burden of Disease framework and harmonized with year-wise data on OA publications, experimental model use, interventional clinical trials, and funding acknowledgements derived from PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov. Publication domains were classified using predefined, rule-based queries applied to metadata fields. Temporal trends, proportional composition, and burden–research scaling relationships were evaluated using descriptive regression and proportion-based analyses. Results: Between 1999 and 2023, global osteoarthritis (OA) disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) approximately doubled, while annual OA publication volume increased more than fourfold. Log–log regression indicated elastic scaling of research output relative to DALYs (β > 1), reflecting disproportionate growth in publication activity. In contrast, interventional clinical trial initiation peaked in the late 2000s and declined in recent years, with trial activity representing a consistently small fraction of total OA publications. Human-relevant experimental approaches constituted a modest and relatively stable proportion of OA research over time. Lag-association analyses demonstrated strong temporal co-trending between DALYs and total publications, moderate alignment for human-relevant research, and weaker associations for clinical trial activity. Conclusion: Over 1999–2023, osteoarthritis research activity expanded substantially relative to disease burden, while downstream clinical translation and adoption of human-relevant approaches remained comparatively limited.

Suggested Citation

  • Riya Mukherjee & Chung-Ming Chang, 2026. "Global burden-integrated analysis of osteoarthritis research-to-translation dynamics, 1999–2023," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(5), pages 1-19, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0349128
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0349128
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0349128
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0349128&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0349128?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0349128. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.