IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0349112.html

Prevalence of dental caries in the primary, mixed and permanent dentitions in Nigeria: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Folahanmi Tomiwa Akinsolu
  • Olunike Rebecca Abodunrin
  • Abel Chukwuemeka
  • Mobolaji Timothy Olagunju
  • Ifeoluwa Eunice Adewole
  • Abideen Olurotimi Salako
  • George Uchenna Eleje
  • Adebola Oluyemisi Ehizele
  • Joanne Lusher
  • Foluso Owotade
  • Oliver Chukwujekwu Ezechi
  • Morẹ́nikẹ́ Oluwátóyìn Foláyan

Abstract

Background: The national prevalence of dental caries in Nigeria is currently unknown. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the prevalence of dental caries in the primary, mixed and permanent dentition among residents in urban, rural and semi-urban Nigeria. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL and Embase databases and Google Scholar for studies published between January 2001 and December 2023 reporting the prevalence of dental caries in Nigeria. The review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022362019) and conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Data extracted included study design, sample size, age of participants, and study location. Study quality and risk of bias were assessed. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed to estimate pooled prevalence. Results: A total of 1,010 records were identified, of which 52 studies were included in the systematic review and 35 were eligible for meta-analysis. Most studies were conducted in Southwestern Nigeria. The overall pooled prevalence of dental caries in Nigeria was 17% (95% CI: 14%–21%; I² = 97%). The pooled prevalence was 16% (95% CI: 10%–24%; I² = 98%) in primary dentition, 16% (95% CI: 11%–23%; I² = 97%) in mixed dentition, and 20% (95% CI: 16%–26%; I² = 96%) in permanent dentition. By setting, the pooled prevalence was 22% (95% CI: 7%–52%; I² = 98%) in rural areas, 17% (95% CI: 14%–22%; I² = 97%) in semi-urban areas, and 14% (95% CI: 6%–29%; I² = 98%) in urban areas. Substantial heterogeneity was observed across studies. Conclusion: Dental caries remains a significant public health concern in Nigeria, affecting approximately one in five individuals. Although variations were observed across dentition types and geographic settings, substantial heterogeneity indicates diverse epidemiological contexts across the country. Strengthened preventive strategies and improved access to oral healthcare services are needed to address the burden of dental caries nationwide.

Suggested Citation

  • Folahanmi Tomiwa Akinsolu & Olunike Rebecca Abodunrin & Abel Chukwuemeka & Mobolaji Timothy Olagunju & Ifeoluwa Eunice Adewole & Abideen Olurotimi Salako & George Uchenna Eleje & Adebola Oluyemisi Ehi, 2026. "Prevalence of dental caries in the primary, mixed and permanent dentitions in Nigeria: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(6), pages 1-26, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0349112
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0349112
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0349112
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0349112&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0349112?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0349112. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.