IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0348955.html

Cost-effectiveness analysis of mepolizumab among patients with severe asthma from the Chinese societal perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Chaohao Shi
  • Yang Wang
  • Chongqing Tan
  • Xiaohui Zeng
  • Qiao Liu

Abstract

Background: Patients with severe asthma, particularly those with an eosinophilic phenotype, face a limited array of treatment options. The Mepolizumab Efficacy in Patients with Severe Asthma (MENSA) trial (clinicaltrials.gov NCT03562195) has underscored the potential therapeutic benefits of mepolizumab as an adjunctive treatment for this patient group. However, the high cost of mepolizumab therapy presents significant economic challenges that may impede its widespread adoption in China. This study aims to assess the cost-effectiveness of mepolizumab from a societal perspective within the Chinese population suffering from severe asthma. Methods: A Markov model spanning a lifetime horizon and employing a 2-week cycle was constructed. The model incorporated clinically significant exacerbations (CSEs) rates from the MENSA trial, along with asthma mortality rates, costs, and health state utilities, sourced from a broad spectrum of literature and national databases. Both costs and effectiveness outcomes were discounted annually at 5%. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated as the primary model output and compared to a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold range of $15,217 to $38,042 per quality-adjusted life-years (QALY). The model’s robustness was evaluated through sensitivity analyses. Results: The base-case analysis indicated an ICER of $848.79 per QALY for mepolizumab, fall below the lower limit of the predefined WTP threshold. Subgroup analyses confirmed this finding across different subpopulations. Deterministic sensitivity analyses showed that mepolizumab’s ICER remained below the lower limit of the predefined WTP threshold even under significant parameter variations. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses further demonstrated mepolizumab’s cost-effectiveness advantage over placebo. Conclusion: Our study concluded that mepolizumab is a cost-effectiveness treatment option for severe asthma in China, applicable across various patient subgroups. This finding is crucial for healthcare decision-makers in China, where balancing cost and health outcomes is essential due to limited resources.

Suggested Citation

  • Chaohao Shi & Yang Wang & Chongqing Tan & Xiaohui Zeng & Qiao Liu, 2026. "Cost-effectiveness analysis of mepolizumab among patients with severe asthma from the Chinese societal perspective," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(5), pages 1-13, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0348955
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0348955
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0348955
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0348955&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0348955?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0348955. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.