IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0348875.html

The Walking Trail Making Test is more accurate than a Dual-Task Walking Test for screening the level of fall risk among community-dwelling older people

Author

Listed:
  • Rafael Mauti
  • Romain Tisserand
  • Anaïck Perrochon
  • Melanie Gallot
  • Arnaud Peronin
  • Thomas Gilbert
  • Patrick Fargier
  • Pascal Chabaud

Abstract

Background: Preventing falls is a major issue for older people. Aging leads to a decline in executive functions and functional capacities, increasing the risk of falling. Most cognitive-motor assessments are additional Dual-Tasks (DTs), open to prioritization strategies, leading to heterogeneous results in the screening of the level of fall risk. The Walking Trail Making Test (W-TMT) is an incorporated cognitive-motor task sensitive to detecting cognitive impairments. A high level of fall risk is generally associated with higher cognitive impairments. The objective of this study is to evaluate the detection performance of the most complex condition of the W-TMT (WTMT-B) in the screening of people at a high level of fall risk, and to compare it to an additional DT, the 6-Meter Walking Test in the DT condition (6MWT-DT). Methodology: 101 community-dwelling older people participated in the study. They were classified into three levels of fall risk (i.e., low, moderate, high) by the French Health Examination Center Fall Risk screening tool. They performed the three conditions of the W-TMT (N, A, and B) and the 6MWT in single-task and DT conditions. For both tasks, execution times were measured and compared between the levels of fall risk. Concordance index (c-index) analysis was performed to evaluate and compare the overall classification performance of the W-TMT-B and the 6MWT-DT for the three levels of fall risk. Receiver operating characteristic analyses (providing the Area Under the Curve, AUC) were conducted on the same variables to evaluate and compare the capacity of both tasks to detect people at a high level of fall risk. Results: For the W-TMT, ANCOVA (corrected by spontaneous walking speed) showed significant group*condition interaction (F4,194 = 8.27, p

Suggested Citation

  • Rafael Mauti & Romain Tisserand & Anaïck Perrochon & Melanie Gallot & Arnaud Peronin & Thomas Gilbert & Patrick Fargier & Pascal Chabaud, 2026. "The Walking Trail Making Test is more accurate than a Dual-Task Walking Test for screening the level of fall risk among community-dwelling older people," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(5), pages 1-16, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0348875
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0348875
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0348875
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0348875&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0348875?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0348875. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.