IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0348708.html

Negotiating climate change: Science, policy, and the invisible power embedded in public discourse in Chinese social media

Author

Listed:
  • Kaijiao Zhang
  • Bingkang Qu
  • Qizhi Huang

Abstract

The use of social media has enabled diverse actors to engage in climate discourse, shifting climate change from a purely scientific issue to a broader global risk topic. Drawing on a decade of data from the Chinese platform Zhihu, this study employs social network analysis and correspondence analysis to examine the structural characteristics and phased evolution of social representations of climate change. The findings indicate that public discussions consistently anchor climate change in scientific evidence, forming a relatively stable core system. However, its peripheral structure has undergone continuous adjustment and expansion through the interaction between policy contexts and public communication, shifting from an emphasis on scientific consensus toward risk governance and economic pathways. This structural configuration reflects the dialogical and polyphasic nature of knowledge, while the economic perspective has emerged as a dominant representation of climate change in the Chinese context. This demonstrates the ongoing restructuring of social representations of climate change under the influence of policy and ideology, which may have significant implications for the public's perception of risk.

Suggested Citation

  • Kaijiao Zhang & Bingkang Qu & Qizhi Huang, 2026. "Negotiating climate change: Science, policy, and the invisible power embedded in public discourse in Chinese social media," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(5), pages 1-18, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0348708
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0348708
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0348708
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0348708&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0348708?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0348708. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.