IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0348585.html

The effectiveness of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for fatigue in people living with chronic kidney disease: A protocol for a systematic review

Author

Listed:
  • Hannah Mary Louise Young
  • Lisa Ancliffe
  • Ffion Curtis
  • Oluwafemi Efuntoye
  • Matthew PM Graham-Brown
  • Selina Lock
  • Kathrine Parker
  • Chris Rolfe
  • Ellesha Smith
  • Aniebiot-Abasi Udofia
  • James O Burton
  • Caroline Booth
  • Ishida Yuko
  • Daniel Scott March

Abstract

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) affects approximately 850 million people worldwide and is associated with a substantial and growing symptom burden. Fatigue is one of the most common and debilitating symptoms across all stages of CKD, with prevalence far exceeding that of the general population. It profoundly affects quality of life, daily functioning, and clinical outcomes, underscoring the need to identify and evaluate effective pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies for its management. This protocol outlines methods for a systematic review to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and perceived effectiveness of interventions for fatigue in people with CKD. We will include randomised controlled trials, non-randomised controlled trials, before-and-after studies, and qualitative evaluations in adults and children with any stage of CKD. Searches will be conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science Core Collection, PsycINFO, and ClinicalTrials.gov, alongside grey literature via Google Scholar. No language or publication date restrictions will be applied. Study selection will follow a two-stage screening process, with two reviewers independently assessing titles/abstracts and then full texts using predefined eligibility criteria. Data will be extracted using a standardised form, capturing study characteristics, interventions, and outcomes. Risk of bias will be assessed with the NIH Study Quality Assessment Tools or the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research. Results will be synthesised narratively, and, where appropriate, pooled using meta-analysis. Certainty of the evidence for the primary outcome will be assessed using the GRADE approach and presented in a Summary of Findings table. This review will provide a comprehensive synthesis of evidence on interventions for fatigue in CKD, highlight gaps to guide future research, and inform the UK Kidney Association Symptom Guidelines.

Suggested Citation

  • Hannah Mary Louise Young & Lisa Ancliffe & Ffion Curtis & Oluwafemi Efuntoye & Matthew PM Graham-Brown & Selina Lock & Kathrine Parker & Chris Rolfe & Ellesha Smith & Aniebiot-Abasi Udofia & James O B, 2026. "The effectiveness of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for fatigue in people living with chronic kidney disease: A protocol for a systematic review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(5), pages 1-11, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0348585
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0348585
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0348585
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0348585&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0348585?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0348585. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.