Author
Listed:
- Ummer Shakeel
- Muhammad Asif Habib
- Muhammad Yasir
- Muhammad Umar Chaudhry
- Muhammad Munwar Iqbal
- Mudassar Ahmad
- Qaisar Abbas
- Muhammad Abdul Qayum
Abstract
Pakistan is the fourth-largest rice producer and the fifth-largest exporter worldwide. Timely disease detection remains challenging due to the scale of cultivation and reliance on manual monitoring. Developing reliable, ongoing computerized systems for plant health management is essential for efficient disease control. A deep learning approach is used as the core method to identify diseases in rice leaves. This methodology employs a range of advanced deep learning architectures to achieve top-tier feature extraction and classification. The publicly available rice leaf disease dataset on Zenodo supports research reproducibility and data transparency. We systematically process a balanced dataset of 1914 image samples using Python with TensorFlow and a GPU to enable high-speed computation for large-scale image processing. This study conducts a systematic comparative evaluation of five deep transfer learning architectures (InceptionV3, DenseNet201, ResNet152V2, EfficientNetV2L and MobileNetV2) trained independently. The base backbone models are then integrated with guided GrabCut segmentation with contour-detection method for interpretable disease localization. In this work, the methods of segmentation by GrabCut and contour detection are introduced to make the results of the study easier to interpret and explain the disease areas, but the final classification outcomes are obtained only on the basis of the underlying deep transfer learning models. As a result, infected leaf areas can be identified more effectively, allowing for better understanding and explainable of the disease.To enhance interpretability, GrabCut segmentation and contour detection are applied as post-hoc visualization techniques to highlight diseased regions corresponding to CNN predictions. These techniques do not influence the classification training process. All five models InceptionV3, DenseNet201,ResNet152V2,EfficientNetV2L and MobileNetV2 demonstrated their effectiveness in detecting rice diseases during training, validation, and testing phases, with models trained over 30 epochs. The training methods and accuracy rates of the models were compared during validation and final testing. InceptionV3 demonstrated the most moderate performance of 98.80% training, 98.44% validation, and 98.43% test accuracy, which means that it has strong generalization and consistent learning behavior. The performance of very high-density networks such as DenseNet201 (98.72% train, 98.43% val, 98.43% test), ResNet152V2 (99.02% train, 99.22% val, 97.39% test), EfficientNetV2L model accuracies (39.01% train, 48.70% val, 44.50% test) also showed competitive results, which validated the effectiveness of deep transfer learning in the classification of rice leaf disease, while MobileNetV2 model accuracies (98.09% train, 98.18% val, 96.87% test) indicate that a lightweight model can still achieve reliable classification performance with lower computational complexity. In general, the comparative analysis defines InceptionV3 as the most stable and efficient model in the framework proposed. These results illustrate InceptionV3 superior generalization ability, supported by explainable methods for improved feature localization, confirming the viability of transfer learning for accurate and practical rice disease detection using GrabCut segmentation and contour detection technique. The complete implementation code and data used for the research experimentation is publicly available at https://github.com/ummershakeel03/Rice-Leaf-Diseases-Classification for reproducibility and reuse.
Suggested Citation
Ummer Shakeel & Muhammad Asif Habib & Muhammad Yasir & Muhammad Umar Chaudhry & Muhammad Munwar Iqbal & Mudassar Ahmad & Qaisar Abbas & Muhammad Abdul Qayum, 2026.
"Enhanced rice leaf disease classification via contour-driven segmentation and optimized deep transfer learning architectures,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(5), pages 1-73, May.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0348290
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0348290
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0348290. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.