IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0348209.html

A retrospective review of sagittal split ramus osteotomy: Incidence and risk factors for neurosensory disturbance of the inferior alveolar nerve

Author

Listed:
  • Takuma Watanabe
  • Shu Inoue
  • Risa Okada
  • Ryuji Uozumi
  • Michinobu Sasaki
  • Tatsuya Kawamura
  • Shizuko Fukuhara
  • Makoto Hirota

Abstract

Sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) is the most commonly performed mandibular procedure in orthognathic surgery. Although generally safe, neurosensory disturbance (NSD) of the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) remains a frequent complication that can impair oral function and quality of life. This retrospective study included 463 patients who underwent SSRO, comprising 873 rami, at our department between 2014 and 2024. Patient- and ramus-level variables were extracted from electronic medical records, with postoperative NSD of the IAN defined as the primary outcome. We investigated the presence or absence of mandibular canal (MC)–lateral cortical bone (LCB) contact on preoperative computed tomography, as well as the three types of lateral osteotomy line on postoperative panoramic radiographs. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize clinical characteristics, and the incidence of NSD was evaluated. Trends in annual NSD proportions were analyzed using a Cochran–Armitage trend test, and univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to assess associated factors. The incidence of NSD was 5.6% at the patient-level and 4.0% at the ramus-level. A decreasing trend in annual NSD incidence was observed (p

Suggested Citation

  • Takuma Watanabe & Shu Inoue & Risa Okada & Ryuji Uozumi & Michinobu Sasaki & Tatsuya Kawamura & Shizuko Fukuhara & Makoto Hirota, 2026. "A retrospective review of sagittal split ramus osteotomy: Incidence and risk factors for neurosensory disturbance of the inferior alveolar nerve," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(5), pages 1-12, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0348209
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0348209
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0348209
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0348209&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0348209?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0348209. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.