IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0348205.html

Effectiveness of design thinking pedagogy in SCCT-based career guidance: Students’ career decision-making self-efficacy and perceived value

Author

Listed:
  • Yahong Cai
  • Nalini Arumugam
  • Yukai Chen

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of design thinking pedagogy on college students’ career decision-making self-efficacy and perceived value in career education. A quasi-experimental design was employed with 140 participants from two homogeneous intact groups. The experimental group implemented design thinking pedagogy, whereas the control group received the regular teacher-centered method in career guidance courses. Data were collected using mixed methods. Quantitative data were collected using a career decision-making self-efficacy scale, and qualitative data were obtained through semi-structured interviews to explore students’ perceived value. Data were analyzed using independent samples t tests, analysis of covariance, and thematic analysis. The results revealed that design thinking pedagogy significantly improved students’ career decision-making self-efficacy through practical skill acquisition, emotional empowerment, and social identity, and perceived high evaluation, indicating that design thinking pedagogy is effective in career education. This study provides empirical evidence for integrating design thinking into career education, contributing to innovative pedagogies in higher education and emphasizing its importance in preparing students to proactively navigate evolving profession landscapes.

Suggested Citation

  • Yahong Cai & Nalini Arumugam & Yukai Chen, 2026. "Effectiveness of design thinking pedagogy in SCCT-based career guidance: Students’ career decision-making self-efficacy and perceived value," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(5), pages 1-14, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0348205
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0348205
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0348205
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0348205&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0348205?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0348205. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.