IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0348084.html

Oral step-down vs full-course intravenous antibiotic therapy for infective endocarditis: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Jose D Cruz-Cuevas
  • Julián Andrés Amador Bedoya
  • María Paula Méndez Gaitán
  • María Camila Ramírez
  • Javier González Quiroga
  • Adelaida Rodríguez Villegas
  • Antonia Sanín Reyes

Abstract

Background: Infective endocarditis (IE) is a life-threatening condition traditionally managed with prolonged intravenous (IV) antibiotic therapy. However, sequential oral antibiotic therapy has emerged as a promising alternative in selected patients, potentially reducing hospital stay, adverse events, and healthcare costs. While the POET trial demonstrated non-inferiority of oral step-down therapy in a narrow subset of patients with left-sided IE, broader applicability remains uncertain. Observational studies and recent meta-analyses have yielded heterogeneous and inconclusive results, underscoring the need for a comprehensive synthesis of current evidence. Methods: This protocol outlines the methodology for a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the effectiveness and safety of sequential oral antibiotic therapy versus full-course IV therapy in adult patients with bacterial IE. We will include randomized controlled trials and observational comparative studies enrolling adults diagnosed with IE by Duke criteria, clinical judgment, or histopathological confirmation. The primary outcomes are all-cause mortality and clinical cure; secondary outcomes include relapse, unplanned cardiac surgery, embolic events, hospital length of stay, and adverse events. Searches will be conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, and LILACS, with no restrictions on publication date or language. Risk of bias will be assessed using RoB 2 and ROBINS-I tools. Data synthesis will follow Cochrane guidelines, and certainty of evidence will be evaluated using the GRADE approach. Discussion: This review will provide a rigorous and up-to-date synthesis of the evidence on oral step-down therapy in IE, addressing populations underrepresented in prior trials. The findings will inform clinical decision-making, guideline development, and future research on optimizing antibiotic strategies for IE. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO registration number: CRD420251104423

Suggested Citation

  • Jose D Cruz-Cuevas & Julián Andrés Amador Bedoya & María Paula Méndez Gaitán & María Camila Ramírez & Javier González Quiroga & Adelaida Rodríguez Villegas & Antonia Sanín Reyes, 2026. "Oral step-down vs full-course intravenous antibiotic therapy for infective endocarditis: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(4), pages 1-8, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0348084
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0348084
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0348084
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0348084&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0348084?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0348084. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.