Author
Listed:
- Parya Jangipour Afshar
- Vahid Yazdi-Feyzabadi
- Zahra Abdolahinia
- AliAkbar Haghdoost
- Jaason M Geerts
- Reza Goudarzi
- Katayoun Tayeri
- Babak Eshrati
- Hamid Sharifi
Abstract
Background: Integrating clinical programs and services is a cost-effective approach that can improve health and system outcomes. This review aimed to provide an overview of the benefits and challenges of integrated programs for HIV, hepatitis B and C, and STI services worldwide and provide recommendations for research and practice. Methods: This scoping review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. We searched electronic databases PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science until May 2025 to extract relevant studies. Additionally, we reviewed reputable grey literature sources, such as WHO and UNAIDS, and references from included publications for further relevant articles. Studies that had eligible criteria were included. We applied a narrative approach to report the findings through an inductive approach. Results: Out of 19,516 initially identified studies, 118 were selected. The benefits and challenges of integration were classified into six categories: integrated service delivery, medical information and technology, human resources, health outcomes, collaboration and partnerships, and financial/physical resources. The significant benefits of these classifications include improved health outcomes, cost-effectiveness, enhanced efficiency, prevention of transmission, use of comprehensive care, reduction of time for receiving necessary services, increased knowledge and awareness, and improved cooperation. However, integration has some challenges, including the need for sufficient infrastructure, budget, human resources, and the potential for increased stress and work pressure on employees. Conclusions: Prioritizing health is key to national development, requiring policies and resources for cost-effective patient and community benefits. This scoping review highlights the feasibility and advantages of integrating services for HIV, hepatitis B and C, and STIs. Our findings strongly support policymakers in prioritizing the planning and implementation of these integrated programs. An evidence-informed integration framework is needed to guide these actions effectively.
Suggested Citation
Parya Jangipour Afshar & Vahid Yazdi-Feyzabadi & Zahra Abdolahinia & AliAkbar Haghdoost & Jaason M Geerts & Reza Goudarzi & Katayoun Tayeri & Babak Eshrati & Hamid Sharifi, 2026.
"Integration of HIV, Hepatitis B, and C, and sexually transmitted infections services: A scoping review of the benefits and challenges,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(5), pages 1-22, May.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0348073
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0348073
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0348073. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.