Author
Listed:
- Jessica Sanchez-Balandran
- Alejandra Martinez Fernandez
- Laura Tovar
- Priyadarshini Pennathur
- Arunkumar Pennathur
Abstract
Occupational exoskeletons show promise in reducing physical strain in industrial work, yet their industrial adoption remains limited. For exoskeletons to be used when performing tasks in industrial settings, they first need to be set up, then fitted and donned, and finally doffed, disassembled and stored for future use. Exoskeleton setup and takedown procedures can significantly impact industry deployment, adoption, and use, yet we have limited knowledge of the complexities in setup and takedown procedures and the resulting deployment barriers. The goals of this study were to understand how task complexity (number of task steps, usability problems and part count) in setup and takedown of exoskeletons impact task completion time and success, and present barriers in deployment. Twenty nine participants completed setup (assembly and donning) and takedown (doffing and disassembly) of four exoskeletons. We measured task times, success rates, task complexity (task step counts, part counts and usability problems). Hierarchical task analysis and heuristic assessments were performed to assess task complexity. Setup tasks, especially assembly, took the most time and exhibited the highest failure rates, whereas takedown tasks were faster and more successful. Participant-level regression analyses (N = 397 observations) showed that number of procedural steps was the strongest predictor, accounting for 66.9% of variance in completion times (β = 0.374, p
Suggested Citation
Jessica Sanchez-Balandran & Alejandra Martinez Fernandez & Laura Tovar & Priyadarshini Pennathur & Arunkumar Pennathur, 2026.
"Task complexity in exoskeleton setup and takedown: Procedural steps and usability problems as predictors of deployment performance,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(4), pages 1-30, April.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0348001
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0348001
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0348001. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.