Author
Listed:
- Amsalu K Addis
- Lipeng Chen
- Hailu Kendie Addis
Abstract
Understanding how technological progress unfolds across advanced and emerging economies remains central to both innovation research and development policy. This study compares the trajectories of technological adoption and innovation in OECD and BRICS countries using a two-way fixed effects difference-in-differences (DID) framework over the period 1995–2023. The analysis focuses on three core indicators: mobile cellular subscriptions, internet usage, and patent applications, and is supported by an extensive set of diagnostic checks, including partial R² contributions, residual normality and heteroskedasticity tests, and Ramsey RESET tests. Despite historically higher levels of connectivity and innovation in OECD countries, the estimated results indicate a relative slowdown in growth rates for mobile subscriptions, internet adoption, and patenting activity, with negative and statistically significant coefficients across specifications with and without control variables. On the other hand, BRICS countries show steady progress in all three outcomes, often rapid, catch‑up. These findings challenge conventional assumptions about the persistence of technological leadership in advanced economies and suggest that emerging economies are increasingly shaping global patterns of technology adoption and innovation. The results emphasize the necessity of policy frameworks that recognize heterogeneous pathways of technological progress and support both diffusion and innovation in a changing global economic landscape.
Suggested Citation
Amsalu K Addis & Lipeng Chen & Hailu Kendie Addis, 2026.
"Technological adoption and innovation in OECD and BRICS countries: A two‑way fixed effects difference‑in‑differences analysis,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(11), pages 1-28, November.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0347936
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0347936
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0347936. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.