IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0347878.html

The impact of walking on creative thinking: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Alex Thabane
  • Vikram Arora
  • Joelle Boilard
  • Adam Sutoski
  • Sameer Parpia
  • Goran Calic
  • Jason W Busse
  • Tyler McKechnie
  • Phillip Staibano
  • Mark Phillips
  • Roni Reiter-Palmon
  • Mohit Bhandari

Abstract

Background: Walking is associated with many benefits, from improved mental health to a reduced risk of mortality – but can it boost creative thinking? Current evidence suggests a positive effect of physical activity on creative thinking, but the specific effect of walking has not been adequately explored. Methods: We conducted a systematic search of the PsycINFO, MEDLINE, Scopus, and ProQuest databases from inception to 8 January 2025 using search terms related to walking and creativity. We then performed meta-analyses of Cohen’s d effect sizes to assess the effect of walking on creative thinking, as represented by divergent thinking (the ability to generate novel and useful ideas) and convergent thinking (the ability to analyze and select ideas to find the best solution). We assessed study quality using a creativity-specific tool, and the certainty of the evidence with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation Framework. Results: We identified 23 studies (12 randomized experimental studies, nine non-randomized experimental studies, two observational studies) from 16 articles including a total of 1,036 participants, most of whom were post-secondary students. We found moderate certainty evidence of a large effect of walking on divergent thinking (d = 0.93 [95% CI 0.44, 1.42]), and very uncertain evidence of a null effect of walking on convergent thinking (d = 0.16 [95% CI −0.31, 0.63]). Sensitivity analyses of randomized trials only found similarly large effects of walking on divergent thinking ability (d = 0.82 [95% CI 0.35, 1.28]). Conclusion: Results suggest that walking likely results in a large increase in divergent thinking, indicating its potential as an intervention to stimulate creative idea generation.

Suggested Citation

  • Alex Thabane & Vikram Arora & Joelle Boilard & Adam Sutoski & Sameer Parpia & Goran Calic & Jason W Busse & Tyler McKechnie & Phillip Staibano & Mark Phillips & Roni Reiter-Palmon & Mohit Bhandari, 2026. "The impact of walking on creative thinking: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(5), pages 1-17, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0347878
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0347878
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0347878
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0347878&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0347878?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0347878. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.