IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0347743.html

Understanding quality-of-life patterns in long COVID: How Symptoms and socioeconomic conditions shape patient wellbeing

Author

Listed:
  • Esther Ortega-Martin
  • Javier Alvarez-Galvez

Abstract

Objective: To characterize the heterogeneity of Long COVID (LC) by identifying distinct patient profiles based on symptoms and quality of life (QoL), and to examine the sociodemographic and clinical predictors associated with these profiles. Study design: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted. Methods: We recruited 363 patients with LC in Spain via an online survey. Symptom patterns were identified through latent class analysis of 15 binary symptoms. QoL was assessed with the patient-derived LC-6D-QoL across six dimensions, and cluster analysis defined QoL subgroups. Logistic regression was applied to examine clinical and sociodemographic predictors of QoL profiles. Results: Two symptom profiles emerged: a low-burden profile, dominated by fatigue and cognitive problems, and a high-burden profile with multisystem involvement. QoL clustered into three profiles—high, middle, and low QoL—with more than half of participants in the low QoL group. Symptom burden and employment status were the strongest predictors of poor QoL, whereas age, sex, education, and income showed limited associations. Social support was more frequently reported among participants with low QoL. Conclusions: LC is characterized by distinct clinical and QoL profiles, with strong interactions between multisystem symptom burden and social determinants. Identifying patients at greatest risk of poor QoL can inform stratified interventions and integrated policies that combine medical care, psychosocial support, and workplace reintegration.

Suggested Citation

  • Esther Ortega-Martin & Javier Alvarez-Galvez, 2026. "Understanding quality-of-life patterns in long COVID: How Symptoms and socioeconomic conditions shape patient wellbeing," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(4), pages 1-13, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0347743
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0347743
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0347743
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0347743&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0347743?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0347743. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.