IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0347684.html

A Monte Carlo simulation study of sample size requirements for the Graded Response Model

Author

Listed:
  • Tatsuya Ikeda

Abstract

Background: The graded response model (GRM) is commonly used in psychometrics to analyze ordinal response data. Despite its growing application in scale development and validation, sample size recommendations—such as those provided by the COSMIN guidelines (e.g., n ≥ 1000)—are often based on expert consensus rather than empirical validation. Furthermore, the extent to which the number of items (J) and the number of response categories (K) contribute to parameter estimation accuracy remains insufficiently explored. Methods: We conducted a Monte Carlo simulation to examine how three design conditions—sample size (n = 500–1500), number of items (J = 5–50), and a number of response categories (K = 4–7)—influence the estimation accuracy of the latent trait parameter (θ) and the item discrimination parameter (a) under the GRM. For each condition, we generated a large population dataset based on predefined distributions for θ, a, and b, and then randomly drew samples (n) for estimation. The GRM was fitted using the EM algorithm. Estimation accuracy was evaluated using root mean squared error (RMSE), FPC-corrected RMSE, and Pearson’s correlation coefficient between true and estimated θ values. Results: The RMSE of the discrimination parameter a decreased with increasing sample size (n) and number of items (J), while the effect of K was negligible. In contrast, the RMSE of θ was primarily influenced by J, with only minor effects from n and K. Notably, the Pearson correlation between true and estimated θ values consistently exceeded r = .98 across all conditions, suggesting high ordinal fidelity even with small samples. Increasing J beyond approximately 30 yielded diminishing returns in RMSE reduction. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that sample size recommendations for GRM should be flexibly tailored to the measurement goal. For accurate estimation of θ, a sufficiently large number of items (e.g., J ≥ 30) can compensate for smaller sample sizes (n ≈ 500), whereas precise estimation of a requires larger samples (n ≥ 1000). The impact of increasing K was limited, indicating that additional response categories may not always enhance parameter recovery. These results provide empirically grounded guidance to support efficient and purpose-specific measurement designs in GRM applications.

Suggested Citation

  • Tatsuya Ikeda, 2026. "A Monte Carlo simulation study of sample size requirements for the Graded Response Model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(4), pages 1-15, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0347684
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0347684
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0347684
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0347684&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0347684?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0347684. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.