IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0347570.html

Prevalence of perinatal depression in Ethiopia: An umbrella review of systematic review and meta-analysis studies

Author

Listed:
  • Mogesie Necho
  • Maregu Shegaw
  • Tamirat Anbesaw
  • Nahom Birru
  • Getinet Ayano
  • Mekonnen Tsehay
  • Wondale Getnet
  • Solomon Yimer
  • Asmare Belete
  • Yosef Zenebe
  • Zelalem Birhan
  • Chalachew Tiruneh

Abstract

Background: Perinatal depression is a significant public health concern that affects women during pregnancy and the postpartum period. Despite being acknowledged globally, the burden of perinatal depression is particularly profound in low and middle-income countries, such as Ethiopia. This umbrella review is therefore intended to systematically consolidate findings on perinatal depression among Ethiopian women to better understand its prevalence, thereby highlighting the gaps in current research and informing future interventions. Methods: This umbrella review used the PRIOR checklist for the reviews of systematic review and meta-analytic studies. The review protocol has been registered on PROSPERO: CRD42023495174. PubMed, EMBASE, and PsycINFO databases were searched for the presence of systematic review and meta-analysis studies. The quality of included articles has been evaluated with a measurement tool to assess systematic review and meta-analysis studies (AMSTAR). A novel graphic approach with an estimated corrected covered area (CCA) has been used to determine the degree of overlap of primary studies in the systematic review and meta-analysis studies. The weighted random effect model was used during the meta-analysis. Result: A total of 28 unique primary studies and 8 systematic reviews, and meta-analysis studies with 15,592 participants were included in this umbrella review. The pooled prevalence of perinatal depressive symptoms in the included systematic review and meta-analysis studies ranges from 20.1% to 25.8%. The pooled umbrella prevalence of perinatal depressive symptoms among women in Ethiopia was 22.49% (95 CI%:21.38, 23.59). The pooled umbrella analysis revealed that the antenatal and postnatal depressive symptoms were 22.76% (95% CI: 19.9, 25.62) and 21.75% (95% CI: 21.03, 22.48), respectively. In addition, the pooled prevalence of perinatal depression in studies that included 10 or below primary studies is 22.86% (95%CI:20.39, 25.33), and in those that included below 10 primary studies, it was 22.10% (95%CI: 21.55, 22.65). The novel graphic presentation depicted a very high degree of overlap of primary studies in the included systematic reviews and meta-analysis studies; corrected covered area (CCA) of 25.5%. Four of the included studies (fifty percent) had high methodological quality, and the remaining four relied on a moderate quality range. Conclusion: The pooled overall, antenatal, and postnatal prevalence of depression symptoms was high in Ethiopia, with no significant difference during the antenatal and postnatal period. An improved understanding of perinatal depression will therefore guide policymakers and health practitioners in developing targeted strategies to alleviate this mental health challenge.

Suggested Citation

  • Mogesie Necho & Maregu Shegaw & Tamirat Anbesaw & Nahom Birru & Getinet Ayano & Mekonnen Tsehay & Wondale Getnet & Solomon Yimer & Asmare Belete & Yosef Zenebe & Zelalem Birhan & Chalachew Tiruneh, 2026. "Prevalence of perinatal depression in Ethiopia: An umbrella review of systematic review and meta-analysis studies," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(4), pages 1-15, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0347570
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0347570
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0347570
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0347570&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0347570?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0347570. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.