Author
Listed:
- Larissa van der Windt
- Martijn Oudijk
- Job Klumper
- Tobias Nijman
- Judith Bosmans
- Ben Willem Mol
- Joris van der Post
- Carolien Roos
- Stavros Petrou
- Kate Walker
Abstract
Background: To assess the cost-effectiveness of treatment with atosiban compared to placebo for threatened preterm birth from 30+0 to 33+6 weeks of gestation. Methods: We performed an economic evaluation from a societal perspective alongside the multicentre randomised controlled APOSTEL 8 trial, including 755 participants with threatened preterm birth from 30+0 to 33+6 weeks of gestation who were randomised to atosiban or placebo, of whom 752 (884 infants) were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. Costs, collected between randomisation and three months corrected child age, were measured using a combination of hospital records and the self-reported iMTA Medical and Productivity Cost Questionnaires and estimated at infant level. The main outcome measure was cost-effectiveness expressed in terms of incremental cost per severe adverse neonatal outcome prevented. Multiple imputation by chained equations was used to handle missing data. Non-parametric bootstrapping was used to estimate statistical uncertainty surrounding incremental cost-effectiveness outcomes. Findings: The difference in mean costs between the atosiban group (€40,743.1) and the placebo group (€40,793.6) was not statistically significant (mean difference: -€50.5; 95% confidence interval (CI) −4037.6 to 3936.7). The incremental cost per severe adverse neonatal outcome prevented was dominant (-€5286.6), falling in the south-east quadrant of the cost-effectiveness plane, indicating cost-savings and reduced severe adverse neonatal outcomes by atosiban. However, the bootstrapped cost-effect pairs were distributed across all four quadrants of the cost-effectiveness plane, indicating high uncertainty surrounding cost-effectiveness estimates. The probability of cost-effectiveness of atosiban reached 50% at a willingness to pay threshold of €33,023.3 per severe adverse neonatal outcome prevented. Interpretation: This economic evaluation did not demonstrate that atosiban is a cost-effective treatment for threatened PTB from 30+0 to 33+6 weeks gestation. In addition to the absence of clinical benefit, our findings show no economic advantage, further discouraging its routine use at this gestational age. These results contribute to optimizing evidence-based management of threatened preterm birth.
Suggested Citation
Larissa van der Windt & Martijn Oudijk & Job Klumper & Tobias Nijman & Judith Bosmans & Ben Willem Mol & Joris van der Post & Carolien Roos & Stavros Petrou & Kate Walker, 2026.
"Cost-effectiveness of atosiban versus placebo for threatened preterm birth (APOSTEL 8 trial),"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(11), pages 1-15, November.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0347475
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0347475
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0347475. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.