IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0347471.html

Beyond silos: Drivers and barriers to intersectoral collaboration in zoonotic disease surveillance and response in the Greater Accra Metropolitan Area, Ghana

Author

Listed:
  • Joannishka K Dsani
  • Sherry Ama Mawuko Johnson
  • Sandul Yasobant
  • Walter Bruchhausen

Abstract

The One Health approach has gained global traction as a strategy to combat zoonotic diseases, which account for 60–75% of emerging infectious diseases. While effective surveillance requires intersectoral collaboration, challenges such as fragmented systems, resource constraints, and weak coordination hinder efforts, particularly in low- and middle-income countries like Ghana. This qualitative study explores the factors influencing collaboration in zoonotic disease surveillance and response at the operational level, providing insights to strengthen intersectoral collaboration and improve public health outcomes across human, animal and wildlife sectors. Using reflexive thematic analysis, we analyzed interviews with 66 professionals from the human, animal, and wildlife health sectors, all directly involved in zoonotic disease surveillance and response. The findings reveal individual factors (interpersonal relationships, personal initiative, motivations, professional hierarchy, shared interests) and structural factors (financial resources, workforce availability, the governance and organization of surveillance and response systems, institutional visibility, knowledge systems) that shape collaboration dynamics. Additionally, positive outcomes from past collaborations created reinforcing cycles that influenced future engagement. Participants shared expectations of improved efficiency, strengthened disease surveillance, and enhanced resource pooling from future collaboration. Despite the global push for intersectoral collaboration, operational-level challenges persist. While grounded in a Ghanaian context, the types of factors identified likely resonate across resource-limited settings, though their specific manifestations and relative importance may vary by context. These findings underscore the broader need for stronger governance, equitable partnerships, and realistic alignment of stakeholder expectations to foster sustainable One Health collaboration and enhance zoonotic disease surveillance globally.

Suggested Citation

  • Joannishka K Dsani & Sherry Ama Mawuko Johnson & Sandul Yasobant & Walter Bruchhausen, 2026. "Beyond silos: Drivers and barriers to intersectoral collaboration in zoonotic disease surveillance and response in the Greater Accra Metropolitan Area, Ghana," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(4), pages 1-18, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0347471
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0347471
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0347471
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0347471&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0347471?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0347471. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.