IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0347262.html

Which digital education approaches most effectively enhance clinical reasoning in undergraduate nursing students: Protocol for a Network Meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Aeri Jang
  • Yun-Hee Kim

Abstract

Background: Clinical reasoning is a core competency in nursing education, enabling students to make accurate and evidence-based clinical decisions. As digital-based learning expands, understanding the comparative effectiveness of different technology-enhanced educational approaches in improving clinical reasoning competence has become essential. However, existing evidence remains fragmented and inconsistent across the intervention types. Objective: This study aims to systematically evaluate and compare the effects of digital-based education interventions on clinical reasoning competence among undergraduate nursing students using a network meta-analysis. Methods: This protocol describes a systematic review and network meta-analysis conducted in accordance with the PRISMA-P and Cochrane Handbook guidelines. Randomized controlled trials will be included and analyzed in separate networks. The primary outcome is clinical reasoning competence; secondary outcomes include critical thinking and problem-solving abilities. Searches will be conducted in PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and CENTRAL from their inception to December 31, 2025. A frequentist network meta-analysis will be performed using R (version 4.1.0) with the netmeta package. Standardized mean differences with 95% confidence intervals will be calculated based on arm-level data. Transitivity and consistency will be assessed using global and local approaches. Intervention rankings will be estimated using P-scores. The certainty of evidence will be assessed using the CINeMA framework and GRADE. Conclusions: This review will provide a comprehensive synthesis and comparative ranking of digital-based education interventions for improving clinical reasoning and related cognitive outcomes in nursing students. The findings will inform evidence-based decisions regarding the integration of effective digital educational strategies into nursing curricula.

Suggested Citation

  • Aeri Jang & Yun-Hee Kim, 2026. "Which digital education approaches most effectively enhance clinical reasoning in undergraduate nursing students: Protocol for a Network Meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(4), pages 1-12, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0347262
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0347262
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0347262
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0347262&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0347262?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0347262. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.