Author
Listed:
- Loema Moshi Buyi
- Rashid Heri
- Menti Lastone Ndile
Abstract
Background: Endotracheal tube suctioning (ETS) is a critical procedure for mechanically ventilated patients. Evidence-based guidelines exist to ensure its safe performance; however, adherence remains suboptimal, especially in resource-limited settings. This study aimed to explore the barriers to ETS guideline adherence among ICU nurses at Muhimbili National Hospital (MNH), Tanzania. Methods: An exploratory qualitative study was conducted in the medical and surgical ICUs of MNH. Seventeen ICU nurses with ≥1 year of experience were purposively sampled. Semi-structured interviews were performed, audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using inductive thematic analysis following Braun and Clarke’s framework. Results: Three key barriers emerged: (1) Resource scarcity, including critical shortages of staff, equipment, and supplies; (2) Human and behavioral challenges, such as knowledge deficits and resistance to change away from routine practice; and (3) Guideline accessibility and usability, concerning poor accessibility and a perception that guidelines were not tailored to the local context. Conclusion: Non-adherence to ETS guidelines primarily reflects systemic constraints rather than individual neglect. Strengthening adherence requires multi-level interventions: improving staffing and resources, providing continuous training, and adapting international guidelines to the local context.
Suggested Citation
Loema Moshi Buyi & Rashid Heri & Menti Lastone Ndile, 2026.
"Barriers to adherence to endotracheal tube suctioning guidelines among intensive care nurses at a Tanzanian national hospital: A qualitative study,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(6), pages 1-12, June.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0347186
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0347186
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0347186. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.