Author
Listed:
- Aja Louise Murray
- Xuefei Li
- Tom Booth
Abstract
Background: Ageism, defined as stereotypes, prejudices and discrimination based on a person’s age is prevalent and negatively impacts individuals and society. In 2016, the World Health Organization (WHO) received a mandate from its Member States to lead the global campaign to combat ageism. However, success in combating ageism is critically dependent on the availability of valid and reliable measures of people’s experiences of ageism that can capture its multidimensional nature and as it is directed against multiple age groups across diverse country settings. The goal of current study is to present a preliminary psychometric validation of a measure specifically designed to meet this need: the 15-item WHO Ageism Experiences Scale. The scale includes items measuring self-directed, interpersonal, and institutional ageism and spans stereotypes, prejudices, and discrimination. Method: We collected data from a UK mixed-age adult sample (N = 402), and several psychometric properties were tested, including internal consistency reliability, test-retest reliability, and convergent validity. Results: Results suggested that the 15-item WHO Ageism Experiences Scale has good internal consistency (where relevant) and test-retest reliability. The exploratory factor analysis supported a one-factor model for self-directed ageism items. The scale also proved to have adequate convergent validity. Discussion: The results provide sufficient support for the adoption of the scale in this population and motivates its translation and validation in other settings, as well as the evaluation of a more extended set of psychometric properties in future studies.
Suggested Citation
Aja Louise Murray & Xuefei Li & Tom Booth, 2026.
"Preliminary validation of the 15-item WHO ageism experiences scale in a mixed-age UK sample,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(5), pages 1-12, May.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0347035
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0347035
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0347035. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.