IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0347030.html

Conceptual qualitative system dynamics model for simulation of perceived workload, stress and performance from industrial work content

Author

Listed:
  • Tuan-anh Tran
  • Tamás Ruppert
  • György Eigner
  • János Abonyi

Abstract

Workload and psychological stress, which industrial workers perceived as stressors, affected their performance after they were exposed to the work content. A model simulating the stress-performance of a working individual is a beneficial tool for work task design and production management, enabling long-term Human Resource Development. Current models and concepts lack the construction of work-content components, human centricity, and the mechanism of stress transformation and effect; therefore not able to reproduce subtle human behaviors. This paper formulates this problem with a multi-disciplinary literature review, and proposes a conceptual qualitative system dynamics model to simulate the stress and performance of workers in a given work environment and conditions. By replicating the changes in work content with associated effects, human-centric solutions and interventions can be designed. A use case in the Vensim environment with different simulated scenarios returned behavior and tendency in the outputs that aligned with phenomena reported in relevant studies. The model enables analysis of human factors in complex manufacturing systems, especially the effect of work content on individual workload-stress perception, benefiting future development of Human Digital Twins. This research calls for experiments and clinical trials to strengthen the existing associations between model factors and more effort for developing realistic mechanisms for modeling human factors in Industry 5.0.

Suggested Citation

  • Tuan-anh Tran & Tamás Ruppert & György Eigner & János Abonyi, 2026. "Conceptual qualitative system dynamics model for simulation of perceived workload, stress and performance from industrial work content," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(5), pages 1-43, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0347030
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0347030
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0347030
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0347030&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0347030?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kenneth L. Schultz & David C. Juran & John W. Boudreau & John O. McClain & L. Joseph Thomas, 1998. "Modeling and Worker Motivation in JIT Production Systems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(12-Part-1), pages 1595-1607, December.
    2. Nina Pološki Vokiæ Ana Bogdaniæ, 2008. "Individual Differences and Occupational Stress Perceived: A Croatian Survey," Zagreb International Review of Economics and Business, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, vol. 11(1), pages 61-79, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yaroslav Rosokha & Chen Wei, 2024. "Cooperation in Queueing Systems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(11), pages 7597-7616, November.
    2. Masha Shunko & Julie Niederhoff & Yaroslav Rosokha, 2018. "Humans Are Not Machines: The Behavioral Impact of Queueing Design on Service Time," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(1), pages 453-473, January.
    3. Mirko Kremer & Francis de Véricourt, 2022. "Mismanaging diagnostic accuracy under congestion," ESMT Research Working Papers ESMT-22-01, ESMT European School of Management and Technology.
    4. Delasay, Mohammad & Ingolfsson, Armann & Kolfal, Bora & Schultz, Kenneth, 2019. "Load effect on service times," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 279(3), pages 673-686.
    5. Tom Fangyun Tan & Serguei Netessine, 2014. "When Does the Devil Make Work? An Empirical Study of the Impact of Workload on Worker Productivity," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(6), pages 1574-1593, June.
    6. Ruth Beer & Anyan Qi & Ignacio Rios, 2026. "Behavioral Externalities of Process Automation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 72(1), pages 575-593, January.
    7. Frederik Ferid Ostermeier & Jochen Deuse, 2024. "A review and classification of scheduling objectives in unpaced flow shops for discrete manufacturing," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 29-49, February.
    8. Song, Lina & Saghafian, Soroush, 2019. "Do Hospital Closures Improve the Efficiency and Quality of Other Hospitals?," Working Paper Series rwp19-006, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
    9. Atkinson, Mariam K. & Saghafian, Soroush, 2019. "Who Should See the Patient? On Discretionary Patient-Provider Assignments in Hospitals," Working Paper Series rwp19-037, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
    10. Karen Donohue & Özalp Özer, 2020. "Behavioral Operations: Past, Present, and Future," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 191-202, January.
    11. Robert J. Niewoehner & KC Diwas & Bradley Staats, 2023. "Physician Discretion and Patient Pick-up: How Familiarity Encourages Multitasking in the Emergency Department," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 71(3), pages 958-978, May.
    12. Guanyi Lu & Rex Yuxing Du & Xiaosong (David) Peng, 2022. "The Impact of Schedule Consistency on Shift Worker Productivity: An Empirical Investigation," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 24(5), pages 2780-2796, September.
    13. Büşra Ergün‐Şahin & Evrim Didem Güneş & Ayşe Kocabıyıkoğlu & Ahmet Keskin, 2022. "How does workload affect test ordering behavior of physicians? An empirical investigation," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(6), pages 2664-2680, June.
    14. Michael Freeman & Nicos Savva & Stefan Scholtes, 2017. "Gatekeepers at Work: An Empirical Analysis of a Maternity Unit," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(10), pages 3147-3167, October.
    15. Maria R. Ibanez & Jonathan R. Clark & Robert S. Huckman & Bradley R. Staats, 2018. "Discretionary Task Ordering: Queue Management in Radiological Services," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(9), pages 4389-4407, September.
    16. Robert J. Batt & Christian Terwiesch, 2017. "Early Task Initiation and Other Load-Adaptive Mechanisms in the Emergency Department," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(11), pages 3531-3551, November.
    17. Hummy Song & Mor Armony & Guillaume Roels, 2024. "Queue Configurations and Operational Performance: An Interplay Between Customer Ownership and Queue Length Awareness," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 26(6), pages 2284-2304, November.
    18. Diwas S. Kc & Christian Terwiesch, 2009. "Impact of Workload on Service Time and Patient Safety: An Econometric Analysis of Hospital Operations," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(9), pages 1486-1498, September.
    19. Clare Snyder & Samantha Keppler & Stephen Leider, 2026. "Algorithm Reliance: Fast and Slow," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 72(1), pages 368-385, January.
    20. John Boudreau & Wallace Hopp & John O. McClain & L. Joseph Thomas, 2003. "On the Interface Between Operations and Human Resources Management," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 5(3), pages 179-202, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0347030. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.