IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0347022.html

Multi-level determinants of tuberculosis treatment completion in rural Uganda: A cross-sectional study

Author

Listed:
  • Munanura Turyasiima
  • Daniel Muliika
  • Gaston Turinawe
  • Miriam Acheng
  • Antony Ikiriza
  • Agnes Alinde
  • Precious Natureeba
  • Amon Nkwansiibwe
  • Balbina Gillian Akot
  • Susan Wendy Wandera Kayizzi
  • Derrick Asaasira
  • Shamim Nantege
  • Iloit Daniel Oode
  • Hilda Barbara Wesonga
  • Raymond Kamara Atuhaire
  • Ronald Kooko

Abstract

Background: Tuberculosis (TB) treatment completion rates in high-burden countries like Uganda often fall short of the WHO End TB Strategy target of ≥90%. This study evaluated multilevel determinants of treatment completion to guide evidence-based improvement strategies in rural Western Uganda. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional, multi-center analytical study of 224 patients with drug-susceptible TB across four public health facilities in Kakumiro District. Eligible participants had been on treatment for at least six months. Data collected via structured questionnaires were validated against facility TB registers. Multivariable logistic regression identified independent predictors, reported as adjusted odds ratios (AOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: The treatment completion rate was 82.6% (185/224), with a 30.4% TB-HIV co-infection rate. Significant positive predictors included high TB knowledge (AOR = 14.0; 95% CI: 3.06–24.5), high economic status (AOR = 7.2; 95% CI: 1.63–31.5), belief in treatment efficacy (AOR = 6.2; 95% CI: 2.02–18.8), and respectful health worker behavior (AOR = 5.0; 95% CI: 2.15–11.83). Community-level support was critical, specifically religious/community leader advocacy (AOR = 4.2; 95% CI: 1.84–9.51) and community health worker (CHW) home visits (AOR = 3.5; 95% CI: 1.64–7.72). Waiting time less than 30 minutes (AOR = 6.3, 95% CI: 1.91–20.96) also positively impacted TB treatment completion. Major negative predictors were male gender (AOR = 0.3; 95% CI: 0.11–0.86), drug stockouts (AOR = 0.3; 95% CI: 0.11–0.70), belief in traditional cures (AOR = 0.3; 95% CI: 0.13–0.71), and stigma (AOR = 0.4; 95% CI: 0.16–0.80). Conclusion: Achieving the WHO End TB targets requires integrated, multilevel interventions. Efforts should focus on male-targeted engagement, strengthening supply chains to eliminate drug stockouts, enhancing CHW-led community outreach, and reducing stigma to ensure equitable treatment success.

Suggested Citation

  • Munanura Turyasiima & Daniel Muliika & Gaston Turinawe & Miriam Acheng & Antony Ikiriza & Agnes Alinde & Precious Natureeba & Amon Nkwansiibwe & Balbina Gillian Akot & Susan Wendy Wandera Kayizzi & De, 2026. "Multi-level determinants of tuberculosis treatment completion in rural Uganda: A cross-sectional study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(4), pages 1-17, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0347022
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0347022
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0347022
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0347022&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0347022?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0347022. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.