IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0346969.html

Emergency department attendance by callers to NHS111 who end the call prior to triage: A time-to-event-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Richard Pilbery
  • Jen Lewis
  • Rebecca Simpson

Abstract

Background: The English National Health Service (NHS) 111 telephone service aims to assist members of the public with urgent medical care needs. However, each year nearly 18% of the 20.6 million calls to NHS 111 are abandoned prior to speaking to a health advisor. There are concerns that callers who are not triaged may not appropriately seek the correct level of care for their needs. Methods: We obtained routine data pertaining to all NHS 111 calls made by adult patients registered with a General Practitioner (GP) in the Bradford region of Yorkshire, England, between the 1st January 2022 and 30th June 2023. Subsequent healthcare access in the 72 hours following each caller’s first (index) call was identified using the Connected Bradford research database. Results: There were 19,056 index non-triaged and 168,609 triaged calls made to NHS 111 by an adult registered with a Bradford GP. A higher proportion of ED attendances in the triaged call cohort were non-avoidable compared with the non-triaged cohort (84.6% compared to 80.0% for triaged calls). In addition, callers in the non-triaged call cohort attended ED later than the triaged call cohort (median 10 vs 8 hours, p

Suggested Citation

  • Richard Pilbery & Jen Lewis & Rebecca Simpson, 2026. "Emergency department attendance by callers to NHS111 who end the call prior to triage: A time-to-event-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(4), pages 1-8, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0346969
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0346969
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0346969
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0346969&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0346969?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0346969. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.