IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0346871.html

Occupational risk factors for depression and anxiety symptoms: Insights from a large cohort study during and after the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic

Author

Listed:
  • Swaantje Casjens
  • Jan Hovanec
  • Nadine Glaser
  • Janka Massag
  • Laura Pfrommer
  • Nils Opel
  • André Karch
  • Saskia Muellmann
  • Irene Moor
  • Michael Gekle
  • Matthias Girndt
  • Simone Hettmer
  • Jessica I Höll
  • Michael Heuser
  • Thomas Frese
  • Rafael Mikolajczyk
  • Thomas Behrens

Abstract

Objectives: An increased risk for an occupation-related SARS-CoV-2 infection has been linked to higher psychological distress. This online survey investigates the prevalence of depressive and anxiety symptoms in a large sample of 34,303 participants from the German cohort for digital health research (DigiHero) after the pandemic (late 2023, t1) and retrospectively from the Omicron wave (early 2022, t0), emphasizing variations across occupational groups and work-related risk factors. Methods: Participants reported their employment status (currently working; seeking employment; not working). Workers provided their primary occupation to assess occupational SARS-CoV-2 infection risk. Symptoms of depression and anxiety (assessed via PHQ-4) and additional occupational risk factors were solicited for each time point. Associations between occupational exposure and stressors with the four-level PHQ-4 outcome were analyzed separately for t1 and t0 using ordinal regression and expressed as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: Over 60% of respondents were working at t1, and 1.4% classified themselves as seeking a job. Job seekers reported highest and non-working individuals lowest depressive and anxiety symptoms. Symptom severity varied by occupation with elevated odds in traffic/logistics professions exclusively at t1 (OR=1.24, 95% CI 1.04–1.48) and healthcare professions exclusively at t0 (OR=1.08, 95% CI 1.01–1.16). High occupational SARS-CoV-2 infection risk was linked to symptoms at t0. Overall, these associations were modest and partly attenuated after additional adjustment for individual work-related stressors (e.g., loneliness at work, chronic work-related stress, work-privacy conflicts). At both timepoints, individual stressors and sociodemographic factors showed stronger associations with severe symptoms than occupation (e.g., chronic work-related stress at t1 OR=2.87, 95% CI 2.70–3.04). Conclusions: Persistent post-pandemic depressive and anxiety symptoms among workers emphasize the importance of addressing individual psychosocial work-related stressors.

Suggested Citation

  • Swaantje Casjens & Jan Hovanec & Nadine Glaser & Janka Massag & Laura Pfrommer & Nils Opel & André Karch & Saskia Muellmann & Irene Moor & Michael Gekle & Matthias Girndt & Simone Hettmer & Jessica I , 2026. "Occupational risk factors for depression and anxiety symptoms: Insights from a large cohort study during and after the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(4), pages 1-17, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0346871
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0346871
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0346871
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0346871&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0346871?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0346871. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.