IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0346794.html

Safeguarding children and strengthening families through the application and utilization of family group decision making: A systematic review protocol

Author

Listed:
  • Collen Mafira Ngadhi
  • Shenaaz Wareley
  • Patrick Joseph
  • Chanté Johannes
  • Gary Spolander
  • Nicolette Vanessa Roman

Abstract

Children and families often face adversities that require whole-family interventions to promote well-being. Traditional child welfare models often demonstrate insufficient family involvement in decision-making, leading to gaps in safeguarding efforts. The Family Group Decision-Making (FGDM) model emerged as an intervention that empowers families to identify and develop solutions to their challenges. The aim of this systematic review protocol is to assess the application and utilisation of FGDM with a specific focus on synthesizing evidence that can inform its implementation within developing country contexts, where child welfare systems may face unique challenges. The Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome (PICO) framework will be used to define the research question. The inclusion and exclusion criteria will be based on studies that focus on FGDM (including its variants), publications from 2014 to December 2024, and studies published in English. Qualitative and quantitative design studies will be included. EBSCOhost (CINAHL, Masterfile Premier, MEDLINE, Academic Search Ultimate), PubMed, Sabinet, Wiley Online Library, Scopus, and Web of Science will be accessed through the University of the Western Cape’s library catalogue. Search terms will be combined with relevant keywords to create search strings using Boolean operators. The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklists will be used for appraisal. Three independent reviewers will screen articles, a fourth reviewer consulted in case of disagreements. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) flowchart will illustrate the search, screening, and selection process. Data will be qualitatively synthesized using thematic analysis. This protocol is registered on Open Science Framework https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/B3TH8.

Suggested Citation

  • Collen Mafira Ngadhi & Shenaaz Wareley & Patrick Joseph & Chanté Johannes & Gary Spolander & Nicolette Vanessa Roman, 2026. "Safeguarding children and strengthening families through the application and utilization of family group decision making: A systematic review protocol," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(4), pages 1-8, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0346794
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0346794
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0346794
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0346794&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0346794?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0346794. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.