Author
Listed:
- Hussam Hamou
- Julius Kernbach
- Hani Ridwan
- Kimberley Fay-Rodrian
- Hans Clusmann
- Anke Hoellig
- Michael Veldeman
Abstract
Background: Chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) recurrence requiring reoperation occurs in 5–33% of cases. Predicting recurrence could enable risk-stratified surveillance, reducing imaging in low-risk patients while maintaining monitoring for high-risk individuals. We evaluated whether machine learning could achieve clinically actionable recurrence prediction using routinely available variables. Methods: This retrospective single-center study included 564 consecutive patients undergoing surgical cSDH evacuation (2015–2023), randomly divided into training (75%, n = 422) and test (25%, n = 142) sets. We developed and compared three models, regularized logistic regression, Random Forest, and XGBoost, using 31 predictor variables. Model development and tuning used 10-fold cross-validation on the training set; the best model was evaluated on the held-out test set. The primary outcome was postoperative recurrence requiring reoperation. Results: Postoperative recurrence occurred in 170 patients (30.1%). In the training set, XGBoost achieved the highest cross-validated ROC AUC (0.713, SE = 0.024), matching Random Forest and outperforming logistic regression (0.686). Hematoma volume, coagulation parameters, and disease severity markers (ICU admission, GCS) were the most influential predictors, though effect sizes remained modest. On the test set, the final XGBoost model achieved ROC AUC 0.688 (95% CI 0.590–0.772), with satisfactory average calibration but overconfident individual-level risk estimates (calibration slope 0.615). At the clinically relevant 90% sensitivity threshold, specificity was only 30.3%, allowing potential imaging reduction in roughly one-third of non-recurrence patients. Consistency between training and test performance indicated these limitations reflect predictor information content rather than overfitting. Conclusions: In this single-center cohort, machine learning models using routinely available clinical and radiographic variables did not achieve clinically actionable risk stratification for cSDH recurrence under internal validation, with discriminative capacity insufficient to identify a low-risk subgroup suitable for de-escalated surveillance. These findings suggest recurrence is driven by factors not captured in standard clinical assessment, supporting uniform or symptom-driven imaging strategies over risk-stratified approaches.
Suggested Citation
Hussam Hamou & Julius Kernbach & Hani Ridwan & Kimberley Fay-Rodrian & Hans Clusmann & Anke Hoellig & Michael Veldeman, 2026.
"Classification of recurrence status after surgical treatment of chronic subdural hemorrhage – A machine learning approach,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(9), pages 1-24, September.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0346756
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0346756
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0346756. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.