IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0346581.html

Integrated approach to model distribution and assess habitat suitability of killifish species in Oman’s local streams (wadis) under current and future climate conditions

Author

Listed:
  • Aziza S Al Adhoobi
  • Amna Al Ruheili
  • Saud M Al Jufaili
  • Wenresti Gallardo

Abstract

Freshwater ecosystems in arid regions possess extraordinary levels of biodiversity, yet they are subject to unprecedented pressures of climate change and anthropogenic activities. We employed an integrated approach of incorporating species distribution modeling (MaxEnt), habitat suitability modeling, and protected area analysis to assess conservation requirements for two endemic/native killifish (Aphaniops kruppi and A. stoliczkanus) in Oman’s freshwater ecosystems. Using MaxEnt with CHELSA bioclimatic variables and topographic indices, we modelled climate change impacts under three shared socio-economic pathways (SSP1–2.6, SSP3–7.0, and SSP5–8.5) spanning 2011–2100. Predictive models demonstrated remarkable accuracy (AUC: 0.974 for A. kruppi, 0.950 for A. stoliczkanus) revealing unique biogeographical patterns. A. kruppi showed restricted southern distribution dependent on monsoon moisture levels, with mean monthly climate moisture index (Cmi_m; 39.9%), mean diurnal range (Bio2; 18.3%), and sediment transport index (STI; 8.4%) as key variables. The distribution of A. stoliczkanus exhibited a more expansive northern range influenced by winter precipitation patterns, with precipitation of the coldest quarter (Bio19; 31%), the sediment transport index (STI; 20.2%), and the stream power index (SPI; 13.3%) as key drivers. Climate projections revealed high extrapolation risk (85–95%) with anticipated habitat reductions. Habitat suitability assessment of 12 stream sites (Boyce Index: 0.894) revealed unexpected specialization-dominance trade-off, where optimal Aphaniops conditions led to competitive exclusion, resulting in negative correlations between habitat suitability and aquatic biodiversity (Shannon diversity: r = −0.577, p = 0.049). Dissolved oxygen emerged as most critical parameter (mean suitability: 0.771 ± 0.308), with only 25% of sites demonstrating a Highly Suitable status. Spatial analysis revealed significant protection gaps: only 0.31–1.34% of high-suitability habitats and 2.6% of high-density wadis currently protected, requiring 6–24-fold increases to meet conservation targets. Species hybridization necessitates landscape-level conservation maintaining connectivity for gene flow. Results demonstrate that desert aquatic fauna conservation requires integrated strategies addressing climate dependencies, multi-habitat corridor protection, tiered water quality standards, and adaptive management accounting for hybridization zones, providing a replicable model for conservation in water-limited environments.

Suggested Citation

  • Aziza S Al Adhoobi & Amna Al Ruheili & Saud M Al Jufaili & Wenresti Gallardo, 2026. "Integrated approach to model distribution and assess habitat suitability of killifish species in Oman’s local streams (wadis) under current and future climate conditions," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(5), pages 1-55, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0346581
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0346581
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0346581
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0346581&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0346581?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0346581. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.