IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0346435.html

Evolutionary game analysis of emergency medical supply production capacity reserves in nonprofit organizations: A theoretical perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Hua Xiao
  • Guoqiang Luo
  • Yisheng Wang
  • Haijun Shuang
  • Bo Li

Abstract

Since the 21st century, global public health emergencies have occurred frequently, posing severe threats to the economic development and social stability of countries worldwide. Against this backdrop, emergency medical supply reserves are particularly crucial—especially the production capacity reserves of non-durable medical materials characterized by high demand, short production cycles, and limited shelf lives. As a theoretical modeling study, this paper adopts the core ideas and analytical methods of evolutionary game theory to construct dynamic evolutionary game models for the cooperative production capacity reserves of emergency medical supplies between nonprofit organizations (NPOs) and reserves enterprises under two scenarios: “perfect competition” and “government incentive policy intervention.” Key factors including reputation benefits, social disaster reduction benefits, and opportunity costs are incorporated to systematically explore the impacts of multiple variables on the decision-making of both cooperative parties. Meanwhile, numerical simulation is employed to quantitatively analyze the operational mechanisms of government incentive policies, specifically one-time subsidies, revenue sharing, cost subsidies, and supervisory penalties. The research findings are as follows: First, the synergistic effect of perfect competition and government incentive policies can promote the evolutionary game system toward cooperative equilibrium. Among these factors, the impact of the incentive allocation coefficient is context-dependent, requiring scientific calibration to balance the interest demands of both parties. Second, the reserves cost-benefit ratio is a core threshold variable determining cooperative behavior. Perfect competition alone tends to fail under high cost-benefit ratios, while the “government-led—NPO-supplemented” collaborative incentive model can break through this threshold constraint via “long-term empowerment + short-term efficiency improvement.” Third, enterprises’ opportunity costs exert a significant negative impact on cooperation, whereas supervisory penalties exceeding a critical threshold can inhibit speculative behaviors and enhance cooperative willingness. Finally, the research findings of this paper are verified through simulation with the background of emergency medical reserves in Chongqing, China. Based on these findings, this study proposes countermeasures including optimizing the incentive allocation mechanism, constructing a collaborative incentive system, and improving the disciplinary constraint mechanism. This research provides new perspectives and practical guidance for optimizing the emergency medical material reserves system and ensuring the stable development of emergency reserves cooperation.

Suggested Citation

  • Hua Xiao & Guoqiang Luo & Yisheng Wang & Haijun Shuang & Bo Li, 2026. "Evolutionary game analysis of emergency medical supply production capacity reserves in nonprofit organizations: A theoretical perspective," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(4), pages 1-31, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0346435
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0346435
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0346435
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0346435&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0346435?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0346435. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.