IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0346414.html

Association of the 24-hour movement behaviours composition with workers’ chronic musculoskeletal pain

Author

Listed:
  • Aino Kitayama
  • Yu-Tai Liu
  • Ai Shibata
  • Sayaka Kurosawa
  • Koichiro Oka

Abstract

Background: Chronic musculoskeletal pain is a significant symptom among workers. 24-hour movement behaviours comprising sleep, sedentary behaviour, light-intensity physical activity, and moderate-to-vigorous-intensity physical activity are associated factors. However, the relationships between these behaviours and workers’ chronic musculoskeletal pain, considering the interrelationship between the behaviours, are still unclear. This study aimed to investigate the associations of 24-hour movement behaviours with workers’ low-back and neck/shoulder pain. Methods: In 2023, cross-sectional survey was conducted targeting adults who registered for a Japanese Internet survey system. Time for 24-hour movement behaviours and other demographic characteristics (age, gender, marital status, education, household income, height, weight, smoking, alcohol, chronic disease, work hours, and job activity) were self-reported. The intensity of low-back and neck/shoulder pain was evaluated using the numerical rating scale and a score of ≥4 was considered as moderate-to-severe pain. Compositional logistic regression and isotemporal substitution were performed to examine the associations of 24-hour movement behaviours and time reallocations between the behaviours with moderate-to-severe low-back and neck/shoulder pain, adjusted for all the demographic variables. Results: 1,665 full-time workers (women: 35.8%, mean age: 42.1 ± 10.2 years) were analysed. Increased sleep and decreased light-intensity or moderate-to-vigorous-intensity physical activity were associated with lower odds of moderate-to-severe low-back (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.54, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.40–0.72; 1.45, 1.25–1.69; 1.17, 1.06–1.30, respectively) and neck/shoulder pain (AOR = 0.60, 95% CI = 0.45–0.80; 1.37, 1.19–1.60; 1.12, 1.01–1.24, respectively). Reallocating sleep from the other behaviours was associated with decreased probabilities of low-back and neck/shoulder pain, whereas replacing sedentary behaviour or light-intensity physical activity with more intense activity was associated with increased probabilities. However, the results of moderate-to-vigorous-intensity physical activity reallocation were no longer significant when restricted to complete cases. Conclusions: Considering the interrelationship of 24-hour movement behaviours, sleep was favourably associated with workers’ low-back and neck/shoulder pain.

Suggested Citation

  • Aino Kitayama & Yu-Tai Liu & Ai Shibata & Sayaka Kurosawa & Koichiro Oka, 2026. "Association of the 24-hour movement behaviours composition with workers’ chronic musculoskeletal pain," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(4), pages 1-12, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0346414
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0346414
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0346414
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0346414&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0346414?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0346414. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.