IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0346396.html

Discourse, sentiment, and resonance of workplace burnout on Chinese social media: A computational analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Mengjiao Yin
  • Yingying Xia

Abstract

Background and theoretical context: Occupational burnout has evolved from an individual psychological concern into a systemic challenge to organisational sustainability. Traditional burnout research relies predominantly on structured scales or small-scale interviews, making it difficult to capture the spontaneous, socially interactive emotional expressions that employees generate in authentic contexts. Against the backdrop of a discursive shift in Chinese digital workplace culture from individual attribution to structural attribution, social media has become a critical arena in which employees express burnout, seek resonance, and produce collective critical discourse, thereby offering a new perspective on burnout research that goes beyond the scale-based paradigm. Research objectives: This study aims to systematically examine the discourse structure of contemporary Chinese workplace burnout (how employees talk about burnout, and which themes appear frequently and are invested with meaning) as well as its resonance mechanism (which emotional expressions are more likely to elicit collective online engagement), with a view to revealing the dual structure of workplace burnout discourse. Methods: Adopting a cross-sectional observational computational social science paradigm with a descriptive and exploratory design, and integrating the theoretical frameworks of emotional labour and affective publics, this study collected texts from five major Chinese social media platforms (Rednote, Bilibili, Weibo, Douyin, and Douban). After data cleaning and line-by-line manual review, 1,276 valid texts were retained. Grounded theory three-layer coding (open coding, axial coding, and selective coding; Fleiss’ Kappa = 0.792) was used to identify discourse themes. A dual-model PCA fusion of RoBERTa and SnowNLP scores was employed to extract sentiment scores, supplemented by human annotation (n = 300; ICC(2,1) = 0.870) for cross-validation. OLS log regression and Poisson pseudo-maximum likelihood estimation (with covariates including follower count, platform, and year) were applied to examine the association between sentiment polarity and like-based engagement. Results: At the discourse level, grounded coding identified 6 axial themes and 3 core categories. The two highest-frequency themes were Labour Time Deprivation and Intensity Overload (22.7%) and Wage Deprivation and Employment Hardship (21.4%). Workers move beyond individualised narratives of emotional exhaustion, directly naming structural oppression through discourse frames such as Organisational Oppression and Institutional Critique (18.0%) and Passive Resistance and Collective Self-deprecation (16.5%), highlighting a paradigm shift from passive endurance to active critique in contemporary Chinese workplace burnout discourse. At the resonance level, follower count was found to exert a suppression effect on the sentiment-like relationship: after controlling for account exposure, negatively valenced content was significantly associated with higher like counts (PCA: beta = -0.403, p

Suggested Citation

  • Mengjiao Yin & Yingying Xia, 2026. "Discourse, sentiment, and resonance of workplace burnout on Chinese social media: A computational analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(8), pages 1-20, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0346396
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0346396
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0346396
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0346396&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0346396?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0346396. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.