IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0346298.html

Integrating systemic inflammation biomarker and clinical predictors for surgical site infection risk assessment in closed pilon fractures: A risk prediction model

Author

Listed:
  • Lin Jin
  • Yanci Zhang
  • Jiale Li
  • Lianxin Song
  • Yang Luo
  • Tianhua Dong
  • Xuebin Zhang

Abstract

Background: Systemic inflammation biomarkers have emerged as promising tools for predicting infection-related complications in orthopedic surgery. However, its predictive value for surgical site infection (SSI) after closed pilon fractures remains underexplored. This study aimed to develop and validate a nomogram that integrates systemic inflammation biomarkers and conventional clinical predictors to estimate the risk of SSI after closed pilon fracture surgery. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from patients aged ≥18 years with closed pilon fractures treated surgically at a tertiary orthopedic center between January 2020 and December 2023. Systemic inflammation response index (SIRI) and other candidate biomarkers were calculated from peripheral blood samples collected upon admission. The diagnosis of SSI was based on CDC criteria, determined through inpatient records and routine 12-month postoperative follow-up. Restricted cubic spline (RCS) curves were used to assess dose-response relationships between biomarkers and SSI. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify independent predictors and construct a nomogram. Model performance was evaluated using discrimination, calibration, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Temporal validation was performed in an independent cohort from the same center (January 2024 to December 2024), and external validation was conducted in an independent cohort from another institution (August 2024 to September 2025) using identical eligibility criteria. Results: Among 1314 patients included in model development, 57 cases (4.34%) of SSI were recorded. RCS analysis revealed a near-linear association between SIRI and SSI risk, with a threshold of 2.01 used for stratification. Multivariable analysis identified SIRI ≥ 2.01, BMI, surgical delay ≥ 6 days, Tscherne classification grade 3, prolonged surgical duration, and elevated fasting blood glucose (FBG) as independent predictors. The nomogram demonstrated good discrimination in the development cohort (AUC = 0.765) and maintained performance in temporal validation (AUC = 0.788) and external validation (AUC = 0.779). Conclusions: This study identified SIRI as a novel and independent systemic inflammation biomarker associated with SSI after closed pilon fracture. We further developed a nomogram combining SIRI and conventional clinical factors and validated it in both temporal and external cohorts, which may support individualized perioperative decision-making after further prospective multicenter validation.

Suggested Citation

  • Lin Jin & Yanci Zhang & Jiale Li & Lianxin Song & Yang Luo & Tianhua Dong & Xuebin Zhang, 2026. "Integrating systemic inflammation biomarker and clinical predictors for surgical site infection risk assessment in closed pilon fractures: A risk prediction model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(4), pages 1-19, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0346298
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0346298
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0346298
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0346298&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0346298?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0346298. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.