IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0346136.html

Minimum dataset with integrated scoring and indexing methods for soil quality assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Khandakar Islam
  • Arifur Rahman
  • Warren Dick
  • Vinayak Shedekar
  • Javier Gonzalez
  • Dexter Watts
  • Norman Fausey
  • Marvin Batte
  • Tara VanToai
  • Randall Reeder
  • Dennis Flanagan

Abstract

Soil quality (SQ) is a key determinant of agricultural productivity and environmental sustainability, yet its assessment is challenged by the diverse functions of soil and the absence of universally accepted indicators. This study aimed to develop a crop yield-correlated minimum dataset (MDSCorr) for SQ assessment and evaluate its performance across multiple U.S. regions. Over a five-year period, data (n = 576) from geo-referenced composite soils at 0–30 cm depth were collected from gypsum amended cover crop integrated corn-soybean rotation experimental sites at Shorter (Alabama), Farmland (Indiana), and Hoytville and Piketon (Ohio). Using the available soil and crop yield data, six scoring functions (four linear and two nonlinear) and three indexing approaches (additive, weighted additive, and Nemoro) were evaluated to calculate the SQ index (SQI). The MDSCorr identified a reduced set of key soil properties most strongly associated with corn productivity, including total organic carbon, microbial biomass carbon, active carbon, total nitrogen, and aggregate-related physical indicators explaining SQ. Using different scoring and indexing approaches, the calculated SQI values at the Indiana site, used as a reference ranged from 0.31 to 0.6. Among the approaches, linear scoring with threshold limits and additive indexing produced the most consistent SQI values, reducing variability to within ±1% compared to the total dataset (TDS). The MDSCorr-based SQI showed strong positive correlations with the TDS-derived SQI (R² = 0.53 to 0.93) and outperformed the principal component analysis-based MDS (MDSPCA) in terms of reliability and consistency. Based on MDSCorr-derived SQI values, the relative SQ rankings for the four study sites were: Hoytville > Indiana > Alabama > Piketon. While calibration and validation are recommended across geographic regions and cropping systems, the MDSCorr approach, when combined with linear scoring and additive indexing, has the potential to provide a simplified and transferable framework for SQ assessment.

Suggested Citation

  • Khandakar Islam & Arifur Rahman & Warren Dick & Vinayak Shedekar & Javier Gonzalez & Dexter Watts & Norman Fausey & Marvin Batte & Tara VanToai & Randall Reeder & Dennis Flanagan, 2026. "Minimum dataset with integrated scoring and indexing methods for soil quality assessment," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(4), pages 1-25, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0346136
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0346136
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0346136
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0346136&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0346136?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0346136. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.