IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0346129.html

The effectiveness of dry needling at myofascial trigger points for knee disorders: A quantitative synthesis of randomized controlled trials

Author

Listed:
  • Xin Hu
  • Ting Lei
  • Zheng Liu
  • Zhenchao Xu
  • Guanghui Zhu

Abstract

Purpose: Dry needling (DN) targeting myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) has been proposed as a treatment for knee disorders, including knee osteoarthritis (KOA) and patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS). This meta-analysis evaluated the effectiveness of DN in improving pain and function in patients with knee disorders. Methods: This meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines and was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD420261294603). Systematic searches were performed in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane CENTRAL, CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP databases from inception to December 2025 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing DN targeting MTrPs with sham DN, no intervention, or other active treatments for knee disorders. Primary outcomes were pain intensity measured by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). Secondary outcomes included functional status assessed by the WOMAC functional subscale and the Kujala Patellofemoral Score. Weighted mean differences (WMDs) were calculated using random-effects models. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2) tool, and certainty of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE framework. Results: Twenty RCTs (n = 1,234; mean age range: 22–69 years) met the inclusion criteria. Compared with controls, DN significantly reduced knee pain across all pain measures: NPRS (WMD = –1.00, 95% CI: –1.25 to –0.76; I² = 0.0%), VAS (WMD = –1.19, 95% CI: –1.73 to –0.66; I² = 80.4%), and WOMAC Pain subscale (WMD = –1.76, 95% CI: –2.57 to –0.95; I² = 67.6%), with an overall pooled pain reduction of WMD = –1.25 (95% CI: –1.58 to –0.92; I² = 74.7%). DN also significantly improved knee function as measured by the WOMAC functional subscale (WMD = –6.59, 95% CI: –8.88 to –4.29; I² = 61.6%) and the Kujala Patellofemoral Score (WMD = 6.39, 95% CI: 4.64 to 8.14; I² = 30.1%). Pre-specified sensitivity analyses using standardized mean differences confirmed the robustness of these findings. The overall risk of bias was moderate, with concerns primarily related to inadequate blinding of participants and outcome assessors. The GRADE certainty of evidence was rated as moderate for all primary outcomes. Conclusion: DN targeting MTrPs provides significant short-term pain relief and functional improvement in KOA and PFPS, with pain reductions approaching clinically important thresholds. However, substantial heterogeneity, blinding limitations, and short follow-up necessitate cautious interpretation, and high-quality long-term RCTs are needed.

Suggested Citation

  • Xin Hu & Ting Lei & Zheng Liu & Zhenchao Xu & Guanghui Zhu, 2026. "The effectiveness of dry needling at myofascial trigger points for knee disorders: A quantitative synthesis of randomized controlled trials," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(4), pages 1-16, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0346129
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0346129
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0346129
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0346129&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0346129?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0346129. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.