Author
Listed:
- Yingping Nie
- Qintong Lin
- Wenlai Xia
- Lihui Tu
Abstract
Social practice constitutes an essential aspect of talent development in higher education institutions, and the evaluation index system for social practice enables the quality of talent cultivation in these institutions to be determined. Grounded in the theoretical framework of the CIPP evaluation model, this study incorporates insights from 27 policy texts, core studies, and qualitative interview findings. It first identifies potential evaluation indicators for social practice, then gathers research samples via questionnaires and employs the Delphi method to assess the significance of these indicators. As a result, it establishes a social practice evaluation index system for higher education institutions, which includes four primary indicators, eleven secondary indicators, and thirty-seven tertiary indicators. Building upon this, the study utilizes the AHP to score the final evaluation index system and assign weights, thus completing the construction of the index system. The index system developed in this study not only concentrates on the process and scope of social practice activities, but also considers the internal and external factors that affect the implementation of social practice. Furthermore, it emphasizes the integration of formative and summative evaluations, offering valuable guidance for enhancing and improving social practice activities.
Suggested Citation
Yingping Nie & Qintong Lin & Wenlai Xia & Lihui Tu, 2026.
"Research on the comprehensive evaluation index system of social practice in Chinese universities based on the CIPP model,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(4), pages 1-19, April.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0346058
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0346058
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0346058. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.