IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0346056.html

Technological impact, generality, and complementarity of artificial intelligence patents: Evidence from Samsung Electronics

Author

Listed:
  • Sangrok Lee
  • Taehyun Jung

Abstract

This study examines the extent to which artificial intelligence (AI) technologies are more pervasive and technologically complementary than non-AI technologies. Drawing on the literature on general purpose technologies (GPTs), we hypothesize that AI technologies exhibit greater pervasiveness—reflected in higher technological impact and broader generality—and stronger technological complementarity than non-AI patents. Using a firm-level analysis of patents filed by Samsung Electronics between 1982 and 2018, we find that AI patents demonstrate significantly higher impact, wider generality, and stronger systematic complementarity compared to matched non-AI patents. These results are robust across alternative matching specifications and multiple operationalizations of the key variables. Our findings offer firm-level empirical supporting AI’s GPT-like characteristics and shed light on how AI-driven innovations may generate sustained incentives for technological advancement, even amid processes of creative destruction. The paper concludes by discussing key theoretical, managerial, and policy implications.

Suggested Citation

  • Sangrok Lee & Taehyun Jung, 2026. "Technological impact, generality, and complementarity of artificial intelligence patents: Evidence from Samsung Electronics," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(5), pages 1-35, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0346056
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0346056
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0346056
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0346056&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0346056?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0346056. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.