IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0346026.html

Does a degree in medicine or a specialist programme or socioeconomic status advance the career of general practitioners in primary healthcare?

Author

Listed:
  • Dandan Zheng
  • Gazi Mahabubul Alam
  • Karima Bashir
  • Norlizah Che Hassan
  • Miao Lei

Abstract

Extensive studies have investigated possible mechanism to improve the career path of general practitioners (GPs) in order to ensure the primary healthcare system (PHC) functions properly. Nevertheless, this problem persists in many countries and it is aggravated by preferential policy. Against this background, the current study examined whether the diverse groups of GPs employed by the PHC system help to develop a sustainable PHC system or create a dysfunctional one. This quantitative cross-sectional survey sampled 12,767 graduates from 13 medical schools in China. Secondary data was collected on socioeconomic status (SES), career advancement, educational qualification, demographic characteristics and graduates’ employment information. The collected data was analyzed using group regression and mediation analysis. Results indicated that, among the 1,769 clinical physicians working in PHC institutions, the ratio of specialist to specialists transferred general practitioners and full general practitioners is 3:2:1, indicating a horizontal mismatch. Furthermore, medical graduates’ degree program type significantly relates to their career advancement and SES mediated the link between medical graduates’ degree program type and career advancement with an indirect effect: Internal Medicine SP-GP → SES → CA (β = 0.040, P

Suggested Citation

  • Dandan Zheng & Gazi Mahabubul Alam & Karima Bashir & Norlizah Che Hassan & Miao Lei, 2026. "Does a degree in medicine or a specialist programme or socioeconomic status advance the career of general practitioners in primary healthcare?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(3), pages 1-17, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0346026
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0346026
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0346026
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0346026&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0346026?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0346026. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.