IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0345977.html

Antimicrobial and antibiofilm evaluation of thymol, sodium azide, and sodium lauryl sulfate against multidrug-resistant pathogens: An integrated experimental and computational study

Author

Listed:
  • Kamal A Qureshi
  • Adil Parvez

Abstract

Multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens represent a major global health challenge, underscoring the urgent need for new antimicrobial strategies that can effectively target both planktonic cells and biofilm-associated infections. This study integrated in vitro antimicrobial and antibiofilm assays with comprehensive in silico analyses to evaluate the repurposing potential of thymol (TM), sodium azide (SA), and sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) against 17 bacterial and two fungal strains, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) clinical isolates. TM showed the strongest overall antimicrobial activity, with low MIC/MBC values (0.10–0.20 mg/mL) and potent antibiofilm effects (MBIC: 0.20–0.39 mg/mL; MBEC: 0.39–0.78 mg/mL). In contrast, SA exhibited similar MICs (0.10–0.78 mg/mL) but required much higher concentrations for bactericidal and antibiofilm endpoints (MBC/MBIC/MBEC 6.25–100 mg/mL), whereas SLS displayed variable activity, with low MICs against most Gram-positive bacteria (0.10–0.20 mg/mL) but high MBC/MBIC/MBEC values (50–100 mg/mL), especially for Gram-negative biofilms. Molecular docking and 300 ns molecular dynamics (MD) simulations revealed that TM forms stable complexes with key microbial targets, most notably FtsZ (ΔG = –11.0 kcal/mol; Kd = 3.2 × 10 ⁻ ¹⁰ M), supported by favorable MM/GBSA binding energies and restrained motions in principal component analysis/free-energy landscape (PCA/FEL) analyses. SA and SLS were primarily used as mechanistic comparators (respiratory inhibitors and membrane disruptors, respectively). In contrast, their non-ionic analogs, phenyl azide (PA) and lauryl sulfate (LS), were explored as potential scaffolds. LS showed a very high predicted affinity for UDP-3-O-acyl-N-acetylglucosamine deacetylase (LpxC) (ΔG = –19.9 kcal/mol; Kd = 1.7 × 10 ⁻ ¹¹ M), indicating promise for future optimization. In silico ADMET profiling identified TM as the most balanced candidate, combining broad-spectrum antibiofilm efficacy with a comparatively favorable predicted safety profile. Overall, TM emerges as a viable repurposable antimicrobial agent, whereas LS-based derivatives represent computationally prioritized scaffolds that warrant further experimental validation.

Suggested Citation

  • Kamal A Qureshi & Adil Parvez, 2026. "Antimicrobial and antibiofilm evaluation of thymol, sodium azide, and sodium lauryl sulfate against multidrug-resistant pathogens: An integrated experimental and computational study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(4), pages 1-28, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0345977
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0345977
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0345977
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0345977&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0345977?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0345977. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.