IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0345942.html

Abrasivity behavior analysis and fuzzy stochastic prediction of weakly cemented sandstones using an improved RBF neural network for quantifying uncertainties

Author

Listed:
  • Yafeng Yao
  • Jian Lin
  • Xiangwei Li
  • Yongheng Li

Abstract

Uncertainties in rock abrasivity often result in the failure of mechanical excavation and excessive cutter wear during TBM tunnelling. Cerchar abrasivity characteristic tests on weakly cemented sandstones (WCS) in western China revealed that their abrasivity changed with physical state and exhibited fuzzy randomness. In the dry state, the abrasivity index reaches its maximum, with the mud-saturated state being intermediate, and the water-saturated state showing the lowest value. In the dry state, the sandstone’s Cerchar Abrasivity Index(CAI) increased (CAI) by 10.64% compared to the mud-saturated state, and by 19.23% compared to the water-saturated state. Studies on the microstructure of WCS in different states indicated that the higher CAI value in the dry state is attributable to its well-preserved internal structure, strong cementation, and high strength. In the water-saturated state, the presence of a slurry film on the sandstone surface led to a higher steel stylus wear than in the fully saturated state. The conventional RBF neural network model was improved by introducing neurone fuzzy splitting and stochastic adjustment of connection weights. Compared to MLR, SVR, and traditional RBF: the MSE of improved RBF is reduced by up to 65.7%, the MAE is reduced by up to 47.4%, and the occurrence rate of local optimality is decreased by 53.8%. Based on this, an improved fuzzy stochastic RBF neural network model was established to predict rock abrasivity using hardness, wave velocity, porosity, and equivalent quartz content as inputs, and the CAI and Cerchar Abrasivity Ratio (CAR) of WCS as outputs. Engineering examples show that the improved RBF fuzzy stochastic model’s prediction of rock abrasivity rate has an error of less than 5% compared to the actual measured values, and the predicted Coefficient of Determination (R2) reaches 0.967. Therefore, the enhanced prediction model successfully addressed the uncertainty in abrasivity characteristics of WCS in western China.

Suggested Citation

  • Yafeng Yao & Jian Lin & Xiangwei Li & Yongheng Li, 2026. "Abrasivity behavior analysis and fuzzy stochastic prediction of weakly cemented sandstones using an improved RBF neural network for quantifying uncertainties," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(4), pages 1-25, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0345942
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0345942
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0345942
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0345942&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0345942?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0345942. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.