IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0345875.html

Reputation and trust in health insurance: A scoping review of key drivers and outcomes

Author

Listed:
  • Gaël Saillen
  • Nicola Diviani
  • Sara Rubinelli

Abstract

Background: Reputation is a critical factor in the health insurance industry, impacting business performance and public health outcomes. However, despite its acknowledged importance, the reputation of health insurers has received limited attention in both academic research and industry practice. Gaining a comprehensive understanding of health insurers’ reputation could help insurers strategically manage their public image while providing policymakers with valuable insights to develop policies that improve health outcomes. Objective: This study aims to identify the factors shaping the reputation of health insurers and to assess the broader impacts of reputation within the industry and the health care system. Design: A scoping review was conducted to map the existing literature on the reputation of health insurers. Using the PRISMA-ScR framework, it identified key determinants and outcomes of health insurer reputation, clarified concepts of reputation and trust, and highlighted gaps in the current body of literature. Results: A total of 3385 records were identified, of which 397 were fully screened for eligibility, resulting in the inclusion of 45 studies. The majority of the included studies conducted surveys (n = 40), while the minority employed qualitative interviews (n = 6) and focus group discussions (n = 7). The total number of participants involved in the included studies is 31’344. The analysis identified 23 descriptives themes, which were organised into two main analytical categories: determinants and outcomes. The determinants included 17 descriptive themes which have been further classified into three groups based on whether they pertain to policyholders, insurers or providers. The outcomes consist of six key descriptive themes. Conclusion: This review provides a thorough analysis of research that have investigated different aspects of health insurance reputation and identify significant gaps in the literature. It maps key determinants of reputation – such as corporate culture, product structure, and service quality – that insurers can directly influence. Additionally, factors like the quality of healthcare providers and targeted communication efforts may also be linked to reputation. The analysis underscores the importance of reputation for core business activities (e.g., client acquisition and retention) and its role in preventive healthcare. Notably, there is a lack of research on the regulatory implications of insurers’ reputation, suggesting a need for further studies to enhance preventive strategies and integrate insurers into a broader public health framework.

Suggested Citation

  • Gaël Saillen & Nicola Diviani & Sara Rubinelli, 2026. "Reputation and trust in health insurance: A scoping review of key drivers and outcomes," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(3), pages 1-18, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0345875
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0345875
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0345875
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0345875&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0345875?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0345875. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.