IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0345868.html

Prevalence of heart failure and coronary artery disease in older adults experiencing homelessness: A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol with a consultative exercise

Author

Listed:
  • Kristina M Kokorelias
  • Yu Qing Huang
  • Maurita T Harris
  • Peter M Hoang

Abstract

Background: Heart failure (HF) is a major global public health challenge and a leading cause of morbidity and mortality, particularly among older adults. The rising prevalence of HF is driven by aging populations and the increasing burden of chronic conditions such as hypertension, diabetes, and obesity. In Canada alone, over 750,000 individuals live with HF, with over 100,000 new cases diagnosed annually. Despite advancements in pharmacological and device-based treatments, HF remains a primary cause of hospital admissions, with readmission rates exceeding 20% within 30 days. The associated healthcare costs are projected to reach $2.8 billion annually by 2030. Objective: Older adults experiencing homelessness represent a particularly vulnerable population at risk for HF. Homelessness is associated with increased exposure to cardiovascular risk factors, including inadequate access to preventive healthcare, high rates of comorbid conditions, and environmental stressors. Evidence suggests that individuals experiencing homelessness have a significantly higher incidence and earlier onset of HF compared to the general population, yet this intersection remains underexplored in the literature. This paper outlines the protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis that aims to address this gap by synthesizing the prevalence, incidence, and mortality of HF among older adults who have experienced homelessness. Methods: This systematic review will follow the PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines and has been registered on the Open Science Framework. We will include studies examining the prevalence, incidence, or mortality of HF among older adults (aged 50 and above) with a history of homelessness. The decision to lower the age threshold to 50 reflects the accelerated aging process observed in this population, who often experience age-related conditions at a younger chronological age. Eligible study designs include cross-sectional, cohort, and case-control studies. Quantitative data from peer-reviewed publications and grey literature will be included, with no language or date restrictions. A comprehensive search strategy will be applied across major electronic databases, including Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ISI Web of Science. We will also perform grey literature searches through Google Scholar and governmental websites. Backward citation tracking will be conducted to identify additional relevant studies. Study selection will involve independent screening by three reviewers, with disagreements resolved by consensus. Data extraction will include study characteristics, participant demographics, and HF-related outcomes. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Checklist for Prevalence Studies and the ROBINS-E tool for non-randomized studies. Results: The review will estimate pooled prevalence, incidence, and mortality rates of HF in older adults experiencing homelessness. Where possible, we will conduct subgroup analyses based on age, sex, and comorbidities. Meta-regression and sensitivity analyses will be performed to assess the robustness of the findings. Conclusion: This systematic review and meta-analysis will provide the first comprehensive synthesis of HF epidemiology in older adults experiencing homelessness. By identifying disparities in cardiovascular health outcomes, this study aims to inform public health policies, healthcare delivery, and future research to improve cardiovascular care for this marginalized population.

Suggested Citation

  • Kristina M Kokorelias & Yu Qing Huang & Maurita T Harris & Peter M Hoang, 2026. "Prevalence of heart failure and coronary artery disease in older adults experiencing homelessness: A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol with a consultative exercise," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(6), pages 1-10, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0345868
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0345868
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0345868
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0345868&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0345868?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0345868. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.