Author
Listed:
- Md Minhajul
- Md Mahfuzur Rahman
- Md Ismail Tareque
Abstract
Internal migration plays a crucial role in shaping healthcare utilization patterns, particularly in developing countries. However, its influence on maternal healthcare utilization, especially on antenatal care (ANC) utilization, remains underexplored. This study examines the association between internal migration and receiving antenatal care services among women aged 15–49 years using nationally representative cross-sectional data from the 2022 Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey. This study analyzed 4,306 currently married women who had at least one live birth in the three years preceding the survey. Descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and multivariable logistic regression models were employed to examine the association of migration status with receiving professional ANC and quality ANC visits. Our analysis shows that rural-to-urban migrants had the highest likelihood of receiving both professional ANC and quality ANC visits (68.5% and 38.2%, respectively). The adjusted odds ratios show that rural-to-urban migrants were significantly more likely to receive a professional ANC visit (AOR = 1.58, 95% CI: 1.11–2.24) than the urban residents, whereas urban-to-rural migrants were significantly less likely to receive that service (AOR = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.60–0.91) than their urban counterparts. A similar pattern was observed for the utilization of quality ANC (AOR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.58–0.94) among urban-to-rural migrants. These findings indicate apparent inequalities among different groups of migrant women in their access to maternal healthcare services. Strengthening rural healthcare infrastructure and enhancing awareness about the importance of ANC could help ensure equitable access to maternal health care services in Bangladesh and other countries with similar contexts.
Suggested Citation
Md Minhajul & Md Mahfuzur Rahman & Md Ismail Tareque, 2026.
"Influence of internal migration on antenatal care utilization in Bangladesh: Findings from a nationally representative cross-sectional survey,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(6), pages 1-16, June.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0345817
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0345817
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0345817. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.