IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0345790.html

Violence against women migrant workers in Thailand: A cross-sectional study on experiences, impact, and help seeking

Author

Listed:
  • Montakarn Chuemchit
  • Nyan Linn
  • Chit Pyae Pyae Han
  • Zayar Lynn
  • Suttharuethai Chernkwanma
  • Nutta Taneepanichskul
  • Wandee Sirichokchatchawan
  • Ratana Somrongthong

Abstract

Background: Violence against women migrant workers is an alarming public health problem. This study aims to investigate the experiences and impact of violence on women migrant workers in Thailand, including their help-seeking patterns, knowledge, future plans for seeking help, ways of help received, and the factors associated with violence. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 494 women migrant workers across seven key provinces in Thailand – Bangkok, Chiang Rai, Chonburi, Samut Prakan, Rayong, Samut Sakhon, and Tak. Data was collected by well-trained enumerators using the validated standardized structured questionnaire. We analysed multiple logistic regressions to investigate the factors associated with experiences of violence and adjusted odds ratios (AOR) with a 95% CI were presented. Results: The study identified the lifetime prevalence of violence to be 54.45%, 42.47% for intimate partner violence (IPV), and 46.15% for non-intimate partner violence (N-IPV). Women experienced psychological, physical, and occupational impacts from violence. A significant proportion of women sought informal support from friends (59.1%) and family (52.6%), while formal support was most commonly sought from employers (15.3%) and the police (6.6%). Factors associated with IPV and/or N-IPV among women migrant workers included area of residence, duration of stay, monthly income, perceived safety, Thai language proficiency, and job or income loss during the COVID-19 pandemic. Conclusion: The findings highlight widespread violence against migrant women workers in Thailand, urging the need for tailored support services. Key strategies include strengthening workplace-based protections, multilingual reporting mechanisms, peer networks, culturally relevant education, and individual- and community-level interventions within labour, health, and social protection systems. Collaborative efforts among policymakers and stakeholders are vital for the prevention of and response to violence and for ensuring the safety of women migrant workers.

Suggested Citation

  • Montakarn Chuemchit & Nyan Linn & Chit Pyae Pyae Han & Zayar Lynn & Suttharuethai Chernkwanma & Nutta Taneepanichskul & Wandee Sirichokchatchawan & Ratana Somrongthong, 2026. "Violence against women migrant workers in Thailand: A cross-sectional study on experiences, impact, and help seeking," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(4), pages 1-18, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0345790
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0345790
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0345790
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0345790&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0345790?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0345790. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.